2007-03-25 17:22:03 · 7 answers · asked by christian b 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
until everyone who has a prior claim dies or abdicates
2007-03-29 13:05:51 · answer #1 · answered by unclefrunk 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not as long as you have to wait for the "Throne" of Disney. I really had to go bad and the line was like, miles long, longer that Pirates of the Carribean, longer than It's a Small World. It was horrible, I couldn't wait so I headed for Tom Sawyer's Island and want behind a bush.
I hope you can use the throne soon.
2007-03-25 17:27:43 · answer #2 · answered by valcus43 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Upon the death of a Sovereign, his or her heir immediately and automatically succeeds, without any need for confirmation or further ceremony.
Nevertheless, it is customary for the accession of the Sovereign to be publicly proclaimed.
After an appropriate period of mourning has passed, the Sovereign is also crowned.
Coronations are held in Westminster Abbey.
The Archbishop of Canterbury normally officiates, though the Sovereign may designate any other bishop of the Church of England.
A coronation is not necessary for a Sovereign to rule; for example, Edward VIII was never crowned, yet was the undoubted king during his short reign. (20 January 1936, until his abdication on 11 December 1936)
In 1936, King Edward VIII abdicated and was succeeded by his brother George VI.
.
2007-03-25 18:14:21 · answer #3 · answered by Hamish 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I never been a royal,but to be familliar with it cause of my best friend my class mate in college and most of all my roommate in a dormitory run by sisters.
Why should the government of UK and Denmark wait till the Queen Dies before the crowning takesplace. Why not passed a legislation that the queen at well retiring age has the right to witness such crowning ceremony that can only be happened in a life time. I think in this way it create peace and harmony as well as reconcilliation acceptance to reality in the family. And the heiress has the time to hear all parting advices a time for reunion with in the family.
This people yes royals and fight its other, kill its other in the history books, but ice may melts nor broken and water may run its ways. I think time to be sensible, after all royalty is more of corporation and business than a personal relation.
And I wish the authorities will be brave enough just enough to stand who is really meant to the throne. After all we do not purposely designed ourselves to be born with highest royalty. Nor in support to the valid heiress/heir.
Goodness begets goodness as transparency begets transparency, and all for prospperity for the royal family thats the main purpose , roots of love to make MONEY NOT JUST MONEY BUT WEALTH BY TRILLIONS FOLDS THATS MONEY IN ROYALTY NOT A PENNY ON PHILIPPINE ECONOMY.
Queen mother was sensible enough to crowned Queen Elizabeth 1952 and sided herself in support to her beloved daughter. Crowned Charles as Prince of Wales, Crowned Princess Set as Crowned Princess of Denmark and so on all over the Empire very busy Marrying all royal couples of UK that sun never ever sit. UK and DK was never been on empty nobility. Despite of US recession on economy UK was an economic giant.
I wish therell will be a politician running for a congress for royals, I think Im qualified. A chemical Engineer on a flatform.
2007-03-26 01:15:11 · answer #4 · answered by DARRIGOULD U 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You must wait until the ruling monarch dies or gives it up or abdicates. Its not done by elections. Its a job for life.
2007-03-25 17:25:36 · answer #5 · answered by Jerry G 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm descended from Edward III so there's a few million ahead of me, I'm sure. LOL
2007-03-25 18:30:18 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you're talking about the line of succession, then I'm not in it.
2007-03-25 18:34:49 · answer #7 · answered by JerH1 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋