Do cons teach their children the arts of lying, child molestation, and bad grammar?

Question

naturally, this is specifically aimed at those who asked a similiar question a few minutes back.

Generalising can be bad. Ignorant generalising makes you reps look truly stupid.

Shrink, are you a girl or an old man in a bikini?

Shrink, seriously, the lighting is bad in that pic. I thought is was a "joke" pic, but seeing how you are not exactly comedy central...

this comment of course refers to all the crazies on Yahoo, not the vast majority of normal ppl.

One of my best friends is a conservative.

Answer 1

Bad grammar, absolutely! Child molestation, not so much. Hate, racism, homophobia, bad economics, ignorance? Yes! I consider being a creationist a form of asperger's syndrome, for example.

Answer 2

The art of lying comes from experience, child molesters tend to breed child molesters regardless of political affiliation, and bad grammar can only be blamed on the education system. Got anything else?

Answer 3

I know of several "cons" as you say, and let me just say, that they are people just like you and I. Some of them have done some really bad things and deserve to be where they are, but I do not think that any of them would intentionally teach a child something that would end up harming them. I think that you have watched too many TV shows and movies. I have worked in a prison and again these are people who have made bad decisions for what ever reason but I have never seen or heard any one of them say something to a child to teach them to end up in a prison setting. I believe that most offenders would hope and pray that no one in their family would end up locked down. I hope that I have enlightened you somewhat.

Answer 4

Yes you can get classes from the 700 club and Pat Robinson. Rush Limbaugh is real active daily with the right wing brainwashing rhetoric on Talk Radio as well. Fox has their contribution too with Hannity, and O'Reilly.

Answer 5

the three substantial religions of the international evaluate homosexuality a sin. this may well be so till the top of the international. This, mixed with the frenzy to make homosexuality ideal will effect in conflict in this concern till the top of time. it is in basic terms a incontrovertible fact that all of us might desire to settle for. How this conflict is to be dealt with is the only element we are in a position to handle. What human beings have faith can in no way be legislated, in basic terms how we act. vote casting on comparable intercourse marriage? people who have faith it to be sin will constantly vote against it. Argue all you %, it is the way it is going to likely be. (in spite of the indisputable fact that i've got faith that's silly and hazardous for homosexuals to permit themselves to be placed on government lists as homosexuals.) coaching little ones our ideals? ALL mum and dad coach their little ones what they suspect - to think of or say in any different case is stupid. Is it "coaching hate"? From a Christian attitude, that's from a place of love that salvation via Christ is provided. If we believed somebody grew to become into doing something that would desire to hold them the wrath of God, and saved silent - that would desire to be hating the guy. i think of we % college vouchers so all mum and dad can deliver their teenagers to colleges that coach what the discern needs taught (ALL colleges have an schedule - there is not any such element as "impartial" coaching.) And all mum and dad might desire to sense this variety. right this moment, public colleges are exceedingly plenty interior the arms of a liberal group - and liberal mum and dad are comfortable with the schedule being pushed. interior the 50's it grew to become into probable Christian mum and dad who have been comfortable with that decade's college schedule. I assume that throughout the subsequent twenty years interior america of a, it is going to likely be Muslims who would be pleased with the regularly occurring public college schedule. law and court docket judgements in this concern would be occurring to any extent further. And that's slightly risky. What "behaviour" would be regulated? What "speech" would be regulated? Already, in our defense force, the 1st modification now no longer exists for chaplains. they are in a position to now no longer pray in Jesus' call, nor can they say that homosexuality is sin. To take Jesus far off from a chaplain is to make him an earthly counsellor - the be conscious chaplain shouldn't additionally be used anymore.

Answer 6

Do the libs teach their spawn anything at all? No they rely on everybody else to foot the bill for ED-U-CAT-TING the little monsters because they always have some higher calling that usually involves demonizing anybody that doesn't go along with the agenda that doesn''t exist.

Answer 7

No, but some kids pick it up from hanging around the children of Libs.

Answer 8

Generalizing makes reps look stupid so it looks smart to turn around and do the same, not to mention hypicritical?? Oh my.

Answer 9

NO
NEVER
NOT AT ALL

That would be the liberals.
Lying - from Clinton your Grand Master
Child Molesting - Studds - who you all hailed as a great man
Bad Grammar - hmmm... Barney Franks the ugly fat brothel owner uses bad grammar.

Answer 10

No, this is what public education is for.

Hey, thanks. Actually, the lighting is why the picture isn't great. It looks better in my 360. And, I've been at the beach for the past week, or I'd be ignoring your rubbish. Give me a day or two, and I will be.