See the difference...
2007-03-25 16:40:35 · 21 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I have listened to both in the past. I hear both their slants from a mile away. Rush became more hateful as the Clinton years progressed so I finally turned him off for good. I look for the entertainment value, but could care less about their personal take on life as a whole myself.
You guys have more to offer than radio peronalities. Too bad some of you don't see that in yourselves. Most do though. You guys rock...
2007-03-25 16:57:57 · update #1
PS what in the world is a peronalities (above)
2007-03-25 16:58:45 · update #2
Sociopath psychology.....since only a sociopath can understand the logic of another sociopath like an alcoholic sharing with another alcoholic.....this is the logic you get from Rush Limbaugh.
2007-03-25 19:50:32 · answer #1 · answered by leonard bruce 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Al Franken used to be funny.
It has been a long time since he strayed from biting, witty observations and into mean-spirited , baseless rants.
Limbaugh, I agree, began to swerve into that negative pattern a few years ago, but has mellowed considerably.
The obvious difference that comes to mind is that Democrats actually take a guy like Franken and act like he's a legitimate candidate for the US Senate!
Give me a break!
What will he run on, the 'Hate speech' platform?
Except for the fact that she is smarter and a far more talented writer, Franken is the liberal counterpart to Anne coulter...you don't see Republicans urging her to run for office, do you?
2007-03-26 03:09:00 · answer #2 · answered by Garrett S 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, even whilst people yawn i do no longer. i like to play a sport with my associates the place somebody will yawn and we observed who yawns first. I in no way in many situations win except i'm sick with a chilly because of the fact i'm getting so drained that is as though I stayed up an entire week with a wink of sleep.
2016-12-15 08:56:10 · answer #3 · answered by unck 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i laugh at them both. I read rush's first book though. I think since then, he hasn't been serious. I give him a B on the book though. the rest of his books are more humorous though
EDIT: peronalities is defined as a major butt hemorrhage
2007-03-25 16:51:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Al Franken is a genius. Rush is wrong. The things he says are just totally socially irresponsible and hypocritical. To be a fan of his, you probably have had a partial lobotomy in some point in your past. I do prefer him over (D)Anne Coulter anyday, however.
2007-03-25 16:49:15 · answer #5 · answered by Donny S 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Actually, I consider you the Limbaugh of the yahoo answers political forum.
The difference between you and Limbaugh is that he explains himself. You just pop up on a frequent basis like an annoying field mouse who doesn't understand that winter is over.
2007-03-25 16:46:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
I view Franken as a fool.
Limbaugh's words are to be heard then researched by myself to see how I feel. I am republican and we don't take commentator's words for gospel. There is a little thing called reading......
Liberals should try it sometime.
2007-03-25 16:46:16 · answer #7 · answered by For_Gondor! 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
It's always funny when they steal from an orphanage to pay for Al's salary...Stuart Smally, stealing candy from babes before he gets elected, now THAT is natural talent!!
2007-03-25 16:45:29 · answer #8 · answered by gary l 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Are you talking about comedian Rush Limbaugh? I would hope they don't take his words as profound wisdom!
2007-03-25 16:51:40 · answer #9 · answered by Petrushka's Ghost 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Sorry I don't listen to Al Franken or Limbaugh, I don't need a person who gets paid to spew garbage to tell me how or what to think. Just facts please and I do my own decision making.
Maybe that's why liberal talk shows don't survive or fair too well. We do our own thinking!
2007-03-25 16:47:52 · answer #10 · answered by wondermom 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋