English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A lot of people now a days are saying that a person can do whatever they want to as long as they are happy with it, and it doesn't hurt anyone. Some examples: gay/lesbian, drugs, prostitution, sex before marriage, tattoos, body piercings...etc.

In reality as a society do we still have morals and is it true that are society is going threw moral degradation?

2007-03-25 16:04:27 · 5 answers · asked by RcJones 2 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

5 answers

The problem with the idea that it's ok to do things such as what you listed as long as it doesn't affect others is that is does affect others. Homosexual acceptance, drugs, prostitution, fornication, tattoos, body piercings, etc. all lead to a desensitation to immorality. If everyone else is doing it, then you are more likely to do it. Now someone elses actions have affected you.

As a society, we do still have evident morals such as it is still considered wrong to murder.

2007-03-25 17:24:06 · answer #1 · answered by Sergeant of Marines 2 · 1 0

A moral is a message conveyed or a lesson to be learned from a story or event. The moral may be left to the hearer, reader or viewer to determine for themselves, or may be explicitly encapsulated in a maxim. As an example of the latter, at the end of Aesop's fable of the Tortoise and the Hare, in which the plodding and determined tortoise wins a race against the much-faster yet extremely arrogant hare, the moral is "slow and steady wins the race."

The use of stock characters is a means of conveying the moral of the story by eliminating complexity of personality and so spelling out the issues arising in the interplay between the characters, enabling the writer to make clear the message. With more rounded characters, such as those typically found in Shakespeare's plays, the moral may be more nuanced but no less present, and the writer may point it up in other ways (see, for example, the Prologue to Romeo and Juliet.)

Throughout the history of recorded literature, the majority of fictional writing has served not only to entertain but also to instruct, inform or improve their audiences or readership. In classical drama, for example, the rôle of the chorus was to comment on the proceedings and draw out a message for the audience to take away with them; while the novels of Charles Dickens are a vehicle for morals regarding the social and economic system of Victorian Britain.

Morals have typically been more obvious in children's literature, sometimes even being introduced with the phrase, "The moral of the story is …". Such explicit techniques have grown increasingly out of fashion in modern storytelling, and are now usually only included for ironic purposes. As Oscar Wilde observes wryly, The good ended happily, and the bad unhappily. That is what Fiction means.

2007-03-25 16:13:17 · answer #2 · answered by myllur 4 · 0 1

Morality is an best so much folks try in the direction of. No-one may also be fully ethical. For myself morality (as within the ethical majority) is so intently intertwined with cash that it turns into meaningless or no less than a contradiction in phrases.

2016-09-05 16:10:32 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The people that think that, have no morals.
If you care what you do does not offend anybody you have morals

2007-03-25 16:28:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Aren't they little mushrooms? :)

2007-03-25 16:09:51 · answer #5 · answered by lightperson 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers