I dislike bush. Never claimed otherwise, but recently i have just felt somewhat sad.
Bush has one over-ridding ability.
To get what he wants done.. done. DESPITE what anyone else says, evidence to the contrary, or even simple facts. Bush finds a way to get his will done every single time.
Consider the same guy in office, but instead of chasing oil and cash, he is using that same drive and passion to fight the war on drugs.
Or perhaps using his ability on healthcare reform, education, environment, ANY of these things.
He could have went down as one of the greatest presidents ever.
Instead, just a bumbling buffoon, deaths on his staining his soul by the 1000s.. And We are all a sadder nation for it.
2007-03-25 15:37:24 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yep, that pretty much sums it up. It is indeed a sad situation. Karma will come around bite him in the buttt. You wait and see.
2007-03-25 16:10:34 · answer #1 · answered by Surfer Dude 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A. Pit bulls do no longer need to die. God has positioned them in the international for a reason. That reason became no longer for them to be overwhelmed, hanged, or drowned. B. Animals live issues! only because they're animals does no longer mean you may abuse them! A T.V. and an animal are too thoroughly countless issues. the way you positioned it makes it form of feels as if newborn abuse isn't some thing in any respect both. C. only because human beings kill animals (like deer) for sport does no longer mean that isn't any longer suitable both so that you're suitable about this. yet nonetheless could you quite be shot and die without delay or hanged or drowned because you lost in a strive against? D. we are all residing issues. Vick KILLED dogs for leisure. those who beat up (no longer kill) their different halves are drunks and those different form of losers. they're bothered those who maximum in all probability have had a nasty existence or been abused as little ones. Michael Vick has none of those issues. He has a contented existence with tens of millions of money. yet then he forces dogs to strive against and drowns the losers.
2016-12-02 19:43:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well. Im disappointed that he didn't get more good things done since like you say he has an ability to push for things to get done.
Your right he could have been on the books for one of the best.
But the domestic agenda issues were left behind after his first term pretty much.
2007-03-25 15:42:17 · answer #3 · answered by sociald 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
bush could have been great, IF he would have stuck with the conservatism instead of being a rino.
2007-03-25 15:41:27 · answer #4 · answered by curious_One 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋