The president of Iran has been pushing for war with someone, anyone for a while now. He may just get what he has wanted all along. His popularity is falling in his country, the economy in that country is bad. Who better to blame than Britain and the USA for this? Both countries have very wide shoulders and can carry the load for the rest of the world.
http://www.iranpressnews.com/english/source/022286.html
2007-03-25 15:39:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by grandma 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If Iran wants a war with the West, they will either kill them or keep them hostage, the UN will fail to intervene, and we will have to use low level surgical strikes to take out Iran's nuclear facilities.
If Iran doesn't want a war with the West, they will keep them as hostages and basically keep dangling them in front of us like the proverbial carrot and the stick. Either way, they are definitely pawns - I just pray they aren't anybody I know.
My thoughts are with them and their families. Personally, I am ready for war with Iran, Iraq was just phase one of WWIII anyway, Bush knows that.
2007-03-26 01:40:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Wolfgang92 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
man just hell fire every where
the hammers of hell
[accurate to with in [ha ha]2 meters]
lots of little cluster bombs
then send in the conscrpits.[our poor weak ,uneducated working class slobs]
not the elite
bring on com [con]pulsory con-scription
army geddon bring it on
when was there EVER a peace
its a piece for you
a piece for me
the neo cons wont rest till its all in pieces
its written in the book
what horison war is now [allways was]
peace is a delusion
yopu will hear of war and rumers of war
fear not ;god is life [love]
satan wants war fought on forever
god says live
satan says die
neo con messianic maniac bring on
2007-03-25 22:29:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Iran is dealing with two issues. First, Iran has captured 15 British sailors. Second, Iran has refused to cooperate with the U.N. regarding cessation of uranium enrichment.
Military confrontation may be on the horizon.
http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=3961
In addition to the British naval vessels at the Diego Garcia atoll in the Indian ocean, there is a multi-national force in the Persian Gulf. The British HMS Cornwall aircraft carrier strike group, the American aircraft carrier strike group Bremerton-based aircraft carrier CVN-74 John C. Stennis, the American aircraft carrier strike group USS Dwight D. Eisenhower and the French nuclear carrier Charles de Gaulle and its task force are all in close appoximation in the Persian Gulf.
More details about military options can be found here:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iran-strikes.htm
Iran has elicited "confessions" from the 15 British sailors they captured and may put them on trial for espionage. The penalty for espionage in Iran is death.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article1563877.ece
“If it is proven that they deliberately entered Iranian territory, they will be charged with espionage. If that is proven, they can expect a very serious penalty since according to Iranian law, espionage is one of the most serious offences.” Espionage carries a death sentence.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6493391.stm
Iran's detention of 15 Royal Navy personnel is "unjustified and wrong", Prime Minister Tony Blair has said. UK officials are waiting to be granted access to the HMS Cornwall staff, who were seized on Friday, and have not been told where the group are held.
"It simply is not true that they went into Iranian territorial waters and I hope the Iranian government understands how fundamental an issue this is for us," Mr Blair said.
"We have certainly sent the message back to them very clearly indeed. They should not be under any doubt at all about how seriously we regard this act, which is unjustified and wrong."
U.S. and British officials said a boarding party from the frigate HMS Cornwall was seized about during a routine inspection of a merchant ship inside Iraqi territorial waters near the disputed Shatt al-Arab waterway.
The seizure of two Royal Navy inflatable boats took place just outside the mouth of the Shatt al-Arab waterway, a 125-mile channel dividing Iraq from Iran. Its name means Arab Coastline in Arabic, and Iranians call it Arvandrud - Persian for Arvand River. A 1975 treaty recognized the middle of the waterway as the border.
Iranians send arms to Iraqi extremists, including sophisticated roadside bombs. This week, two commanders of an Iraqi Shiite militia told The Associated Press in Baghdad that hundreds of Iraqi Shiites had crossed into Iran for training by the elite Quds force, a branch of Iran's Revolutionary Guard thought to have trained Hezbollah guerrillas in Lebanon.
Regarding enrichment of uranium, Iranian President Mahmaoud Ahmadinejad abruptly cancelled his appearance before the U.N. security council and in his stead, Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki Iran spoke. He indicated that Iran was willing to continue negotiations but without the precondition that uranium enrichment must be halted.
Mottaki said, "the world has two options to proceed on the nuclear issue: continued negotiations or confrontation. Choosing the path of confrontation ... will have its own consequences. "
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070325/D8O3E7J00.html
The U.N. security council unanimously voted to expand sanctions on March 24, 2007.
The new resolution 1747 calls on Iran to comply fully with all previous UN resolutions and join negotiations to reach agreement so as to restore international confidence in the peaceful nature of its nuclear program. Full transparency and cooperation with the IAEA are required. Suspension of Iran’s banned nuclear activities will elicit the parallel suspension of sanctions. The package of incentives offered Tehran last year for its cooperation remains on the table.
The full text of the draft of resolution 1747 appears at this website:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6455853.stm
.
.
2007-03-25 23:30:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it tries to find out a way to break united positive force against isolated position for its nuke program
2007-03-25 22:38:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Shen Zero 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
they are perfect bargaining tools.
2007-03-26 00:31:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
WE R GOING TO BURN IN HELL
2007-03-25 23:47:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋