You're out and about in the jungle. You see a tiger about to pounce on a panda and kill it. The tiger has'nt eaten in a very long time so if he does'nt get the panada he will die. But if the tiger gets the panada the panda will die. You have a gun. What do you do?
2007-03-25 14:51:12 · 22 answers · asked by meeko6811 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I realize the question is a little illogical but this is purely for my own amusement.
2007-03-25 15:01:45 · update #1
I let the Tiger eat the Panda. It's nature. And besides, if it doesn't eat the Panda, then i'ts going to eat me.
2007-03-25 14:54:20 · answer #1 · answered by zil28ennov 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, the tiger already got the panda and killed it, so what is the sense in shooting the tiger if the panda is dead anyway, I would just let the tiger eat the panda, it would not serve a purpose to kill the tiger, too. =)
2007-03-25 14:55:42 · answer #2 · answered by spiritcavegrl 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Watch the tiger kill the panda, then shoot the tiger. Of course I would then have to shoot the panda, too, just to be safe.
2007-03-25 14:56:59 · answer #3 · answered by coasterthefirst 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sorry, but the question is illogical. Pandas do not live where there are tigers.
2007-03-25 14:57:26 · answer #4 · answered by Ted 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
kill the panda ... the tiger is doing what animals do and the panda is the weaker....i'd make sure the panda doesn't suffer being ripped apart.
2007-03-25 14:55:27 · answer #5 · answered by Queenie Peavey 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd shoot the tiger! It'd be harder to watch a jaguar eat a panda. Plus, if I didn't shoot the tiger, I could be next.
2007-03-25 14:53:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Shoot the tiger, why let an innocent panda die?
2007-03-25 14:54:51 · answer #7 · answered by Yay me!!!! 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
who're "they"? and how are "they" going to residing house them, verify their habitat fits nature, verify they have equivalent numbers of woman and male toddler, get them without harming them. besides, you lack the version in the species mandatory for their persistent existence. The minimum possible inhabitants for many species is approximately 50 animals. 2 are not going to do lots to maintain the genetic variety of the species. And once you "get" them, are you going to return the offspring to a nearby that led to their low numbers, such as habitat destruction, overhunting, opposition, alien species, and so on.? it may be extreme high quality to get a pair of Ivory-billed Woodpeckers as that species is extinct and the flurry of sightings distinctive years in the past has been brushed off via maximum ornithologists as artifacts. lower back to the drafting board and verify what factors are inflicting their endangerment, and rectify them. Captive breeding is the very final hotel.
2016-12-08 11:15:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ohemgee!! shoot the panda and join the tiger
2007-03-25 14:56:36 · answer #9 · answered by K I B 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
let him eat the panda, i love tigers
2007-03-25 14:55:16 · answer #10 · answered by young mother 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋