It's not a baby we're talking about here. It's some cells that we wroking Conservatives will have to support it's whole life.
2007-03-25 14:49:30 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The irony is that this is part of their rationale for abortion. I've read countless times how "the poor children that the evil conservatives would force their mothers to deliver would be born into a life of deprivation and poverty".
So the compassionate solution to a potential life of poverty is to kill those babies! (They say it only hurts for a minute or so.)
Sure beats a hard life!
2007-03-26 16:03:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Liberals raise beautiful enlightened children with a free spirit, a love of freedom and a glow from within. Now who could abort such a wonderful gift of God. She would want you to love and support that precious gift given to the earth.
All spirits need a vessel to the planet, if it is a poor liberal then we need to make sure that child receives every opportunity.
2007-03-25 15:16:55 · answer #2 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only a sick twisted Republican would be sick enough to talk like that. Remember that abortions are historically up under Republican power. You cut all the funding for the poor so they have no choice but to abort. You refuse to spend money on government programs to educate people on a choice that reflects their values so women end up turning to abortion.
2007-03-25 15:08:43 · answer #3 · answered by Alan M 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
that is not any longer "nonetheless taking the existence of a toddler". it somewhat is a terrible argument, on condition that homicide is illegitimate. you won't like it, yet existence does not initiate once you say it does. Abortion is grotesque. it is likewise a ethical determination. it is likewise criminal. homicide isn't. provide up employing that argument. If something, extra human beings ought to evaluate having abortions, as adoption fees are low, and countless of people who advance as much as be wards of the state additionally exchange into criminals. they are products of the structures. regrettably, distinctive analyze have shown that for the time of factors the place abortions advance, crimes, over the years, shrink. The opposite is likewise actual. you're appropriate in one element: human beings ought to be careful whilst having intercourse. yet whilst they don't seem to be, i'm no longer keen to pay for their undesirable toddler. in case you enable me to decide out of paying any taxes for them, i will gladly vote to limit abortions.
2016-12-08 11:15:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nah. Nothing wrong with being a single mother provided you're not milking men and the system for money by having four kids by three fathers in six years, because HEAVEN FORBID, that you should have to get a job as well. Poor mother had her right to lifelong welfare and child support restricted by the law and the courts. Typical trailer park trash.
I find it funny that people criticize abortion, then criticize teenage girls for getting pregnant, when they don't want them to have abortions. They want them to become baby factories for the infertile upper-class who wait till their forties to have kids. Women know it will be harder in their thirties. It is the teenage girl's right to keep the child. I am not against having one or two kids as a single parent, but still stand by the old belief that a child must know both parents. Having kids to get child support is wrong. Having kids to trap a man into marriage is wrong. The vast majority of single mothers do not do this. I have seen my own friends do this.
2007-03-25 14:53:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Cells are a baby in the making. Cells grow to be babies. That is common sense, or else where do babies come from? Cells are ALIVE, and just because you can't see the FACE that the cells of a baby looks like, doesn't mean it isn't precious. It is ALIVE! I want to ask those who would abort their (cells), if the cells had had time to grow and become what you call a baby, would you kill it then?
2007-03-25 14:55:40 · answer #6 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
lets see reason not for forcing peopel to abort is same i dont want force people to birth it should be the womans decision and last i checked it isnt illegal be poor and get pregnant do I think its best choice no .
2007-03-26 07:54:22 · answer #7 · answered by pixiedraco2003666 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Once and for all, people support CHOICE! Where does it say in any law written that you can make a decision regarding the person of someone else who has their faculties intact? Please, show me, I'd love to see it. Personally I'm against abortion, but it is not my choice to make regarding anyone but myself, and neither is it yours.
2007-03-25 15:21:02 · answer #8 · answered by Political Enigma 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
False, I know several liberals that are anti-abortion....and I'm one of them.
Focring an abortion is insane.
2007-03-25 14:52:48 · answer #9 · answered by Villain 6 · 7⤊ 0⤋
Even as a blob, it has a heartbeat. Abortion is murder.
I can't tell any woman what to do with her body. I believe that, except under extreme life threatening conditions, only God can take a life.
2007-03-25 15:02:43 · answer #10 · answered by Tiberius 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋