2007-03-25 14:33:57 · 11 answers · asked by theantilib 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
no sorting to do when they attack us
2007-03-25 14:43:40 · update #1
Why is it better for the Moron-In-Chief to create far more terrorists than there were and to make America the most hated nation on earth?
2007-03-25 14:44:41 · answer #1 · answered by marianddoc 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I agree that we need to get the terrorists where they live. They are teaching their little children how to be terrorists at very early ages. This is all that they know. They believe that they will go to heaven if they kill us so they are definitely on a mission. We need to do better to keep them out of the U.S though. Everybody is complaining about wiretapping and some of the things that our government is doing to insure that we are not attacked here but severe measures have to be taken to insure our safety. Its only a matter of time before they strike us again and they are here living amongst us now.I wish that we could take all of the innocent people out of the middle east to keep them safe also, but of course we can't do that. They have lived with the hate and death all of their lives. Its all that they really know unfortunately.
dogsrspc, I agree with you completely!!!!!!!
2007-03-25 14:57:22 · answer #2 · answered by Tracy 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why not add
- On the moon
- Under the Indian Ocean
- On Mount Kilimanjaro
- Up yer butt
- At the North Pole
- In a box of sox
- In a hat with a cat with a bat
Your question is a silly attempt to convince us that Invading Iraq is justified because Saudi "afghan arabs" attacked us on 9-11.
2007-03-25 14:44:58 · answer #3 · answered by elisioloyd 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
It's better to fight them over there. I like how you said "when" they attack us, because I too believe it could be any day now.
Also, the longer we wait to go after Iran, the more strength they will muster up.
The Brit's should definitely go after them. Remember the last hostage crisis with J. Carter. Carter sat on his thumbs for the rest of his term.
Then when Bush Sr. took office, they released them.
If we get another do-nothing Democrat, it will give Iran time to finish their nukes. And Iran will use nukes, no doubt in my mind.
2007-03-25 14:49:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Protecting our own borders and ports. Most of those folks will never make it out of the caves they live in. I think we could do a better job of protecting our country instead of trying to sort out who is a terrorist in the middle-east.
2007-03-25 14:40:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
An old Chinese proverb taught to me a long time ago, actually in the mid-60s, says, "Don't make your enemies hate you."
It's not a matter of fighting over there or over here; that's a calculated ploy to frighten children and cowards and an excuse to violate our Constitutional rights, liberties and freedoms. It's a matter of letting people learn to solve their own problems without our interference and meddling. Our own history of interference and meddling into the affairs of other countries have NOT been too favorable... we're were responsible for Saddam Hussein's rise to power... as each and every dictator of the Caribbean (yes, Castro, too) and even in South America and Central America... and in some African nations. Our own arrogance causes people all around the world to hate us... our readiness to show our might and power!
The fact is that Dubya was too quick to enter into war without forethought, a plan for combat or a plan for leaving; we went into war for the wrong reasons: to allow White House cronies profiteer under the guise of SUPPOSED gathered information of Weapons of Mass Destruction.
What we've done is contribute to the civil war that is presently underway, where we are being misinformed on the accounts taking place over there (as much as we are being misinformed with out wounded and the extent of the injuries), and we're also being misled and lied to on what exactly is going on.
This so-called war might've been over if the professional, experienced and trained professional soldiers had been allowed to do their jobs... without the interference of professional bunglers and men who've never served in the military! We would NOT have had to fight here nor over there if our bungling politicians and greedy super rich and powerful were not lusting to rape foreign lands of oil for their own personal enrichment!
You were led to believe that we'd have to fight our enemies here? You mean like Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols in Oklahoma on April 19, 1995? Or where you referring to David Korech's Branch Davidian raid by FBI in Waco, Texas on February 28, 1993? Or perhaps you're referring to the KKK or Neo Nazis or any of the White Supremacist hate groups? We have our own enemies and home-grown terrorists here right now...
How do you propose to promote democracy elsewhere by limiting our own democracy and violating our Constitutional rights, freedoms and liberties, and lying to the populace while the super rich and powerful continue to profiteer while our government neglects our wounded Vets, our American disabled, retired, elderly and poor? Those are battles worth fighting... taking care of OUR OWN, not by making our enemies want to come here and explode bombs!
2007-03-25 14:48:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yeah, like they're going to let us pick where. Like we're fighting "terrorists" in Iraq.
Give it up, dude.
2007-03-25 14:51:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Both are instrumental in ensuring security for ourselves. Take them out here, where they live, where they sleep, where they eat, where they train, and even when they pray.
2007-03-25 14:43:21 · answer #8 · answered by druszka717 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'd settle for fighting it at all, which I think we don't have the stomach for.
2007-03-25 14:47:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
When we can bring justice to the justice department than I'll let you know the answer.
2007-03-25 14:42:00 · answer #10 · answered by andy r 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋