2007-03-25 14:32:59 · 10 answers · asked by Boof 3 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Just as a pure rusher, he would be easily in top 15, as a all-purpose back, easily one of the best, or the best
2007-03-25 21:05:58 · answer #1 · answered by C.J. 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Seeing as though, I am pretty new football fan, been following it for about 6 years now. I would be very tempted to rank him number 1 but L.T. is just to good and I think his best years are ahead of him, scary isnt it. So I would rank Marshall in the top 2.
2007-03-25 22:56:36 · answer #2 · answered by MJMGrand 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I thought Faulk had a terrific career. You have to remember that he was great immediately for a very bad Colt team. Not sure that I can name anybody better than him catching passes. Maybe Lenny Moore or Roger Craig.
But I don't think he cracks the Top Ten list of running backs.
But he will make the Hall of Fame nonetheless.
2007-03-25 22:49:04 · answer #3 · answered by steve p 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
probably top 5 for all-purpose back and top 25 for all-time backs
not only did run with greatness, he caught the ball out of the back field and caught the ball down field and he made guys miss
the past 2 years marshall didnt do anything(started 1 game in the past 2 years and didnt score a single TD in the past 2 years) because of injuries, so i think if he started those 2 years then i think he would have eclipsed 15,000 career rushing yards and would have gotten over 7,000 career receiving yards
2007-03-25 21:45:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would put him in the top 2 and maybe even at number 1 but I think before his career is over maybe Reggie Bush will be even better barring injury.The only other back I remember even coming close all purpose is Roger Craig with the 49rs.
2007-03-25 21:42:54 · answer #5 · answered by Jim C 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure about where he has to be on that list, but for me, M.F was the firts true receiveing back and opened a door for all the others. Just for that, he has to be considered as one of the greatests.
Willy
2007-03-26 05:31:36 · answer #6 · answered by Willy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I place him in the top 5.He was threat with or withought the ball because of his speed and receiving skills
2007-03-26 16:17:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd rate him number 1, hands down..but i'm from St. Louis, so I'm a little biased ;)
2007-03-26 03:10:50 · answer #8 · answered by Honey J. Valentine 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
top 3 easy
2007-03-25 22:14:36 · answer #9 · answered by zack_1012000 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
number 1 on the overrated all time list.
2007-03-25 21:53:24 · answer #10 · answered by Pistol Pete 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋