I don't. Conservatives like to say that, but they don't appreciate what a watershed moment Iraq is in the history of American imperialism.
After Iraq, we are not going to war in the Middle East again. Ever.
2007-03-25 14:24:20 · 14 answers · asked by Longhaired Freaky Person 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
So what if Iran takes over? Iran has a lot more business having influence in Iraq than we do.
2007-03-25 14:33:07 · update #1
Yes, absolutely. So it is better to take care of the terrorism now, isn't it? If we leave now, we will be seen as scared, frightened cowards, and not staying the course. We will be thought of as weak by terror factions. They will believe they have won, and will laugh at America. Us leaving Iraq, will leave terrorist factions in charge, making them feel powerful, and making us a terror abiding nation, just like the rest of the world. Never doubt it. If we leave, America are cowards, and will be seen by all, as such. We cannot allow that to happen. We cannot be Spain, who after losing 300 people in a terrorist attack on a train, by Al Qaeda, voted for a socialist to be their president, because he promised to stop helping America with the war on terrorism! He did stop helping, just as the terrorists wanted them to, and that means the terrorists voted for the people of Spain, using fear tactics. America is not afraid to defend FREEDOM, we can't be. We practically invented the word!
2007-03-25 14:34:50 · answer #1 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If anybody would have read some history, they would have known, that President Wilson in his unbelievable arrogance, set the stage to the Iraq problem in 1919, when he signed of, during the peace thready of Versailles, on arbitrarily drawn borders of an artificial country Iraq. It has been a destabilizer of the middle east since then, never stopped, just went on hold sometimes. US public and Presidents are never interested in facts, but fiction. Fact is, you can't stabilize a country with three totally opposed believe systems, other then with a brutal dictatorship. We will be there in 25 years still. The Pentagon and Weapons Dealers love that kind of thing.
2007-03-25 14:39:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'm afraid the war in the middle east will be expanded to include Iran before we ever get out of Iraq. The dots are already being connected, we're expanding the number of troops and despite the grandstanding in congress, Bush will get the money he's requesting.
2007-03-25 14:43:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
You are so wrong you have no idea even what you are talking about. We will be at war in the Mid-East no matter the outcome in Iraq . The difference being whether we have Iraq as an ally and friend or as a harbor for extremism.
I am positive that you are indeed a propagandist for the Islamic extremists at the very least if not a cell member.
2007-03-25 14:37:52 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
in line with possibility one might desire to verify in what context Iraq is a war. iraq is an occupied us of a. Occupied international places many times rally a resistence with the help of their human beings against their occupiers. in this context how precisely does the international 'terrorist' slot in? have been the French resistence in WWII terrorists because of fact they battled the Germans who occupied their us of a? of direction many s**t disturbers have pored into Iraq which grew to become into best for civil and non secular strife if all and sundry ever broke down the as quickly as element that united the folk of that us of a - concern of their repressive government. Iraq is confident to break into numerous countries with Iran rising as a close-by potential and the genuine winner of this 'journey'. to attempt to be so black and white and say they're terrorists who 'hate freedom' is undeniable stupid...they see this war as a war for his or her very own freedom that's a great irony.
2016-10-20 11:01:57 · answer #5 · answered by rybicki 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we leave now, that gives Iran, the Taliban remnants, or Hussein's loyalists the perfect situation to take over. Iraq will not just POOF and become stable. There will be no point to the war if we leave now. We need to stabilize.
2007-03-25 14:29:48 · answer #6 · answered by bigsey93ortiz34 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Going to war is a choice. It's not obligatory.
America can defend it's country against real enemies without putting a single troop outside the country.
2007-03-25 14:30:13 · answer #7 · answered by Gerry S 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We will be back in the middle east. A good reason might be because of our unequivical support for Israel. If Iran threatens Israel, you can bet we will be there.
2007-03-25 21:53:36 · answer #8 · answered by Kenneth C 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes we will but it will be before 10 years.
2007-03-25 14:30:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes. In fact, I believe it would be sooner than 10 years.
2007-03-25 14:29:31 · answer #10 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋