Then what did Saddam use on the Kurds? Come on liberals, answer the question, if you dare to tell the truth for once.
2007-03-25 12:34:13 · 8 answers · asked by Armed Civilian 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
For those of you pathetic losers that believe his WMD's were destroyed by the UN farce, and want evidence, go to the CNN report that had the Marines destroying all the warheads that still contained nerve gas..the UN didn't destroy anything. And what exactly were in all those trucks going to Syria. Come on, answer truthfully.
2007-03-25 14:27:35 · update #1
Interestingly I believe it was two weeks ago we found a very large amount of WMD in Iraq. Not reported by the media AT ALL. The left only sees what they want and will do anything to advance their agenda and grab power. Including telling lies. Something they claim to hate so much about Bush. Funny thing is I don't know a single lie Bush has ever told, but I can tell you pages and pages of lies the left has told.
2007-03-25 12:42:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
He had NO WMD's.
The WMD's he HAD were dismantled under U.N. supervision in the years following the first gulf war and the attacks on the kurds.
Bush claimed that Saddam was HIDING WMD's and even the Traitor Bush admits now that Saddam had no WMD's.
Cmon brainwashed neocon pay attention to the facts and then start pointing fingers
2007-03-25 12:40:36 · answer #2 · answered by cybrrgeek 2 · 5⤊ 0⤋
er...nobody disputes Saddam had WMD in the 80s. That's why we put UN sanctions on him; he was forced to get rid of them before the invasion (otherwise he would have used them on our troops when we went in)
Our own weapons inspectors say he destroyed them, as required.
2007-03-25 12:38:35 · answer #3 · answered by William S 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The truth is already out there. The truth as told by those who first arrived during the invasion, by those who are there today.
Of course, since Bushs war, the insurgents and terrorists are fixing that, aren't they? Bringing them by the ton now..aren't they?
2007-03-25 12:42:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Its amazing that people would rather believe Saddam then the World's intelligence
2007-03-25 12:39:25 · answer #5 · answered by John 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think a machine gun could be classified as a weapon of mass destruction against unarmed people, what's your point? How many did he use against Americans in America?
2007-03-25 12:39:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well my neo-con chickenhawk freind -if he did have them why didn't he use them he had a lot of time to prepare-don't tell me he scuttled them out of Iraq-the spineles Bush boys said he was another Hitler -he would have used them if he had them according to neo-con chickenhawk logic..LOL..LOLOL...help me Rush ...Hannity ...Ann...Cheney.
2007-03-25 12:44:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Amen
How about all the liberals and liberal organizations that admitted he had them
UN
Kerry
Clinton
France
Germany
the list goes on.
2007-03-25 12:37:31 · answer #8 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋