English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-25 12:23:09 · 10 answers · asked by theantilib 4 in Politics & Government Politics

You are probably right MacRay

2007-03-25 12:37:50 · update #1

10 answers

I laughed my *** off when I first read this...

Then I realized some liberal is going to think it's a grand idea and I quit laughing.

2007-03-25 12:29:53 · answer #1 · answered by Jadis 6 · 3 1

Why don't we just trade Jimmy Carter in exchange for the hostages?

Better yet, why don't we just trade Hillary Clinton?

2007-03-25 12:29:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Bwaaaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaaaa! Mr. Peanut!

2007-03-25 12:26:44 · answer #3 · answered by bugeyes 4 · 3 1

He did such a great job the first time. 18 months and lots of talking.

Then Reagan came along and made it clear they would be taken by force and what do you know, they were released.

2007-03-25 12:39:50 · answer #4 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 1 1

I'm guessing that I probably don't agree with you on many political issues but I love the irony of the question. Well played.

2007-03-25 12:29:56 · answer #5 · answered by Mac 3 · 1 0

Because Carter would say: "Be-head, Be-head, Be-head".
And the Democrats would say: "Go, Jimmy. Go".

2007-03-25 12:29:47 · answer #6 · answered by wolf 6 · 1 1

Maybe because we would like to remain an ally with Britain.

2007-03-25 12:26:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

We will not have to worry about the terrorist keeping him but we have to worry about what he would give away, remember the Panama Canal!

2007-03-25 12:27:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Because this is the U.K.'s issue, and President Carter is verrry old.

2007-03-25 12:26:23 · answer #9 · answered by Isaac 4 · 1 2

Seeing how much he loves those Arabs, I support that idea.

2007-03-25 12:26:09 · answer #10 · answered by bigsey93ortiz34 3 · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers