What is your opinion on the information on livingdinos.com?

Question

Do you think that man could have seen dinosaurs?

Answer 1

This is a new site for me and considering that I search for these kind of sites I am surprised I have not come across it before. There is a lot of material there and I can only say in general that any responsible reporting on any subject should have at least two confirmable references. It is subjective to just take one eyewitness report and have no collaboration even though it may be true. However if there would be a great number of reports even from just individuals as say concerning the Loch Ness sightings, I would say there is at least something substantial there that cannot be dismissed outright. That dinos and humans coexisted is absolutely verified by historical accounts and photos and tracks and even dead bodies of the creatures for those who have seen the evidence which you can find if you want to. About 2 years back there was the discovery of preserved red blood cells and soft tissue from a dino dug up here in the U.S. which clearly points to a very young age for the dino certainly not millions of years. Look up the book "The Collapse of Evolution" and you will see a good picture of an aquatic dino, probably a paleosaur, and judge for yourself and of course critics will say it is a decomposing basking shark but that won't fly with the picture or the other pictures since published concerning that. Some people will not believe because they
trust what some professor or teacher tells them which is often based on very outdated information and most Darwinistic scientists are atheiests so they don't want to believe in anything other than natualism. They act like you will get confused with the facts or like you are so dimwitted if you disagree. Most people have common sense and that is why after decades of public school indoctrination, most people do not accept Darwinism. Oh yeah, and maybe because no one has ever seen any animal produce another kind other than its own kind. Stick to the scientific method and you have to get rid of Darwinism.

Answer 2

?a million. When naming twins or triplets, what form of subject might you comply with if any? None. I do not just like the proposal of matching names for siblings in any respect. In truth, I'm so insanely in opposition to it, that I have most important problems with making a choice on my favorite identify out of 2 that proportion the equal preliminary (eg. Astrid and August). ?two. How principal do you suppose it's for sibsets to compare? See above. Sibling names will have to NEVER fit, nevertheless, they will have to additionally no longer be polar opposites. For instance, Mary and Bryleigh might be ******* terrible for sisters. I imply, Mary is lovely and female and conventional, and Bryleigh is... good, Bryleigh. ?three. What is your #a million responsible pride first identify for a lady? I have too many! I think if I needed to select, it would be Daenerys. No, I can not select. Don't make me. ?four. What is your #a million responsible pride first identify for a boy? Again, I have too bloody many. If compelled to select, I might try to select Draco. But I can not. ?five. What is a flexible boy identify, (tons of nicknames)? Theodore - Theo, Ted, Teddy Edward - Ed, Eddie, Ned, Ted, Teddy Robert - Rob, Robbie, Bob, Bobby, Robin William - Will, Bill, Billy, Willy, Liam (arguable) Christopher - Chris, Topher, Kit, Chip Alexander - Alex, Xander, Sacha, Lex ?6. Pretentious names - what are a few examples of names you discover pretentious? Are Evangeline or Jacqueline pretentious? I do not discover the ones names pretentious. They finish the primary risk they get to finish. Names I discover pretentious are Sophia, Annabella, and Gabriella. They could not simply quit at Sophie, Annabel, or Gabrielle, no. They needed to hold going and upload a useless -a at the finish, making the names sound overly frilly and some distance too check out-rough. ?7. What is your #a million lengthy and #a million brief first identify for women (a million of every)? Cordelia and Lily (I'm going through lengthy and brief in each sound and spelling, since in any other case I'd select Phoebe for the fast identify). ?eight. Same for boys? Dorian and Rory.

Answer 3

Too bad the site's a nutcase site. It's possible that some dinos still exist. There have been several cryptozoology expeditions to look for them in the Congo. But- finding a living dino simply would NOT, in any way, discredit evolutionary theory. Any more than finding the coelocanth did.

Answer 4

Dinosaurs were dead for at least 64 million years before humans showed up. No. OPINIONS don't count. Well researched facts do.

Answer 5

Anyone that believes man lived with dinosaurs in a religious fanatic and bases their beliefs on nothing more than blind faith.

Answer 6

Yes. I think that they have the time line wrong.,

love and blessings Don