As a Kentucky fan I wouldn't want him back.
He's not leaving Louisville. He's all of 10 minutes from Churchill Downs where he can race his horses and get paid close to $4 million a year (that's including bonuses and endorsements). Plus, for Louisville fans it's okay to go to the NIT from time to time (they were in the race for a #1 seed to the NIT until they won a few key games in the stretch). We're not talking about the Ricky P. that was in his prime. I'd rather have a Billy Donovan, Billy Gillespie, or John Calipari to be frank about it.
2007-03-25 13:22:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by sweetie_tdp 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Who knows? My gut tells me no. But back when Pitino was looking for a job, Tennessee was as well. And we all said "go get Pitino!" But the talking heads all said "he'd never coach for a Kentucky rival!"
So who knows what he might do? I doubt he'll leave his successful situation at Louisville. When he came back to the NCAA he was leaving behind a miserable stint in the NBA.
2007-03-25 12:06:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by psyduck702 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't think Pitino would ever go back to coaching at Kentucky... he already won a national championship when he was there before. How could he top that?
2007-03-25 13:59:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do not think Pitino would leave Louisville. If he did, I really don't think it would be for Kentucky.
But who am I to talk? I thought Bobby Petrino wouldn't leave either!
2007-03-25 11:50:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Suzie Q 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why? Louisville is a high profile coaching job without the ridiculous expectations of UK fans, he is the highest paid coach now, you really think Louisville wouldn't match any offer? Besides, UK fans ripped him when he took the UofL job, who'd want to come back?
2007-03-25 12:31:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Scott B 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
<> in simple terms by way of fact something it criminal would not advise that is precise. <> there's a reason you won't have the capacity to spell 'assume' devoid of '***'. people who assume too plenty finally end up making asses of themselves. <> would not make experience, does it - and yet, there you're advocating people basically assume the government is physically powerful! <> incorrect! <> advert hominem assaults harm your credibility. perchance Marc, like me, would not see too plenty contained in the way of credibility while analyzing your question. <> The term "fetus" actually ability "the greater youthful contained in the womb". The fetus IS a residing individual. existence starts off at concept, no longer beginning nor some arbitrary evaluate between. hence, each abortion constitutes the homicide of an unborn individual. <> however the fetus IS human. hence, abortion IS homicide. <> what's so narrow minded approximately acknowledging the unborn for the residing people they're? by way of fact you're actually unable to try this, would not that advise your innovations is in actuality greater narrow than mine? <> That in simple terms is going to tutor how schizophrenic human establishments could be - and you desire to assume such an employer (the government) is physically powerful.
2016-10-01 11:46:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋