It would help...most would run and dodge it.
Bill Clinton could be the Flag Bearer ( Surrender Flag)
2007-03-25 11:01:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Nah, all the nancy-boy Liberals would ask their mommas to get them a deferment. We'd suddenly have millions of young men with mysterious ailments, dubiously bad backs, and suspicious ulcers. The rest would just highlight their hair and claim to be gay.
Most people are Liberals due to lack of education. Every time I hear a Liberal speak about Economics, it's as if they read the first three pages some chapter of an economics book. They have no idea what they are talking about.
Fox News is the next best cure. I hear all these rants against Fox, but the truth is that the mainstream media is so horrendously biased, that everyone is to some degree brainwashed. For example, you will never read in the mainstream newspapers any of the wondrous achievements we have made in Iraq regarding reconstituting their air force, building new schools, fixing their banking system, building new roads, etc. None of this will ever be reported by slime merchants like the New York Times.
2007-03-25 19:41:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I frequently hear someone or another in the media wondering why there is not as much of a protest for this war, as compared to the Vietnam war. The reason IS the lack of a draft. Vietnam protestors, at least those of a certain, youthful age, were not just against the policy of the war, they were legitimately afraid for their lives, or the lives of loved ones. Currently, no one is in Iraq unless they initially signed up for military service. (Given the number of extended tours, you cannot say there is no one there against their will at this point).
Inititiating a draft is exactly what would inspire the anti-war movement to go mainstream. Unfortunately, if we ever had a legitimate need to defend ourselves militarily, we would probably need a draft to do it.
2007-03-25 18:11:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by jeaner 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
It would lower the moral of the good soldiers we have now. I would be all for it if we dressed them in pink pants and shoes with a white tee depicting Mohammad with a bomb shaped turban and a message in Arabic saying something crude about sheep, and then air dropping them out of airplanes with a single shot rifle and one hand grenade over Iran. If they make it out alive then they may join the real military.
2007-03-27 07:44:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. The only way to rid the US of liberals is to throw out the Constitution. But that doesn't seem to be something you'd have a problem with, since the only right you appear to value is the right to hate and silence others who you don't like.
2007-03-25 18:30:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Probably,because the conservatives will do what they became the masters of during the Vietnam War,and avoid it.
Cheney could probably write a book,"Deferment For Dummies".
2007-03-25 18:16:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Zapatta McFrench 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
You could simply change the name to Bushtopia. Then the liberals could all be Gitmoed.
And the RedsStaters could have the Fugal System they long for.
Go big Red Go
2007-03-25 18:32:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
No.
Even if all the liberals left the U.S., and only conservatives were left, sooner or later, there would be more liberals in the U.S.
Conservative parents don't always produce conservative children. I'm living proof of that. My parents are right-wingers....I'm not.
And it happens more often than you'd think.
Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
2007-03-25 18:14:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by catrionn 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
planning on reinstating the draft are you.
well it was last week that some high ranking bush administration official stated that we could conduct three wars at once.
so much hope and inspiration in the bush admin and their supporters - they all get all welled up when they speak of death, destruction and warfare.
2007-03-25 18:01:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by nostradamus02012 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
Hmmm... I think that would only increase the population of Canada.
I agree that we need freedom of thought in our country, I just do not see any of this coming from Liberalism.
2007-03-25 18:04:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Shrink 5
·
2⤊
2⤋