or more specifically: a reversal of a black hole
Just heard about this and it sound really interesting. would like hear from people who are more knowledgeable about this and get redirected to good sites about this theory
2007-03-25 10:39:41 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
EDIT
Right. it would repel everything and possibly even spit things out from a black hole.
Ain't that crazy?!
2007-03-25 10:43:43 · update #1
White holes as the inverse to black holes WAS floated as a theory when quasars were first discovered, 30 years ago. There seemed no other way to explain the energy output. But now our theories are better and we understand that there is this MONSTER of a huge black hole in the heart of a quasar, so it all makes sense, plus the fact we have other evidence (photographic, Doppler, less active galaxies closer by as they age, etc).
2007-03-25 12:17:25 · answer #1 · answered by stargazergurl22 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Roan argues "No-one has talked about one because no mild can damage out from them" that is misguided: what if one handed in the front of a classic celeb? it can be blotted out, and the black hollow 'talked about', yet no longer easily 'considered'. (A case of 'no longer-seeing' is believing?) Fah king Genius says "gravitational lensing is evidence of the existence of black holes." I.e. the way mild receives bent tells us that there is a few thing large interior of reach, which we won't be able to see, besides the indisputable fact that it can be some thing else that we've not considered yet, so that isn't any longer strictly evidence of black holes. DLM extra surely factors out "you'll argue that each and each body of those observations have some, mystical, change explaination." Or probable a medical, change rationalization. (See above.) oklatono says "we've detected x-rays being emitted form black holes from count number number contained in the shape horizon" that is garbage; no longer some thing comes from contained in the shape horizon (no longer even Hawking radiation): the damage out speed is larger than the speed of light, that is the very similar for x-rays. it truly is form of WHY a black hollow is BLACK!
2016-12-02 19:21:48 · answer #2 · answered by quartermon 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well yes, they're real. They've even been proven and have pictures of them. Or, what I call a white hole. The quasar of the black hole spits out all the stuff it's taken in and throws it out as energy.
2007-03-25 13:00:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
While it is definitely withing General Relativity, I don't think we have actually "viewed" them in the sence we have black holes. Also, black holes and white holes are in no way connected, one thing going into a black hole does not come out of a white whole. They're two seperate entities.
2007-03-25 11:28:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What the? You mean a point in space that you can't get to because of reverse gravity that pushes away everything at the speed of light?
Novel concept to me.
2007-03-25 10:42:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Below is a link from Wikipedia.
Nothing's crazy in the areas of science and space, there's still a lot we don't understand.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_hole
2007-03-25 10:53:37 · answer #6 · answered by finsfancb 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If there are black holes there are also white holes
But opposites attract so there would be neither,they would annihilate each other.
2007-03-26 05:43:44 · answer #7 · answered by Billy Butthead 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sunh a phenominon realy does not exist.
2007-03-25 10:42:50 · answer #8 · answered by Dr Knight M.D 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋