My husband and i are really happy, but i find that he is masturbating alot more than even having sex with me. Howvever, i am pregnant and he doesn't want to hurt the baby according to him, but he was like this even when we were not pregnant. No he is not gay either. I have tried to comfront him about it, and he says that is how he has always been, he loves to masturbate. It really hurts my feeling though, and he gets offended when i do bring it up. Is this normal, and what should i do?
2007-03-25 10:33:34 · 5 answers · asked by hazel 2 in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
Well, if he's scared of hurting the baby and no amount of reassurance will change that, you might try giving him head on a regular basis, him giving you a "pearl necklace" or maybe you perform the "handiwork". All of those are MUCH better than doing it to yourself. Unless he's some kind of freak, trust me he will REALLY like you doing or agreeing to any of those.
2007-03-25 12:23:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, I would guess that you two are still young and it is very normal for young men in relationships to masturbate. Also its normal for the woman to wonder why, because they don't understand the need to masturbate that guys have. But do try and be close with him and tell him you wanna watch. That you love to watch. Just don't worry, it is normal.
2007-03-25 11:52:44 · answer #2 · answered by baldy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did you even think about masturbating with him? My GF and I get off together sometimes, you know 'heavy petting' that kind of thing. Or some times I get off on a pair of her 'dirty' panties while she watches. Basically sex doesn't always have to be penis in the vagina. Just cook up ways to to build sexual tension it's fun.
2007-03-25 12:16:42 · answer #3 · answered by Helios K 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First you should reassure him that unless you are in high risk pregnancy sex is normal and healthy. If that doesn't help maybe try helping him masturbate, or maybe seeing a sex therapist.
2007-03-25 11:37:48 · answer #4 · answered by rlm9mtm 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
properly, darling, by way of actuality that, till the midsection a protracted time, it became lawful - in the two the church's and the civil government' eyes - for a pair who meant to marry yet had no longer yet executed so you might have intercourse (they could no longer be charged with fornication if caught), and that the church did no longer blink while referred to as upon to solemnize a pair's marriage on the comparable time it baptized their first 2 infants (given the challenge of commute and the occasional shortage of clergymen), it variety of feels to me that the perspective of contemporary Christians in the direction of pre-marital intercourse and the fetishizing of virginity owes greater to the nineteenth century Victorian perspective than to any church teachings. yet that is in simple terms my opinion. (((Keith)))
2016-10-01 11:42:25 · answer #5 · answered by puzo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋