I don't think they would have. They had more talented teams in the past and couldn't do it. I think by releasing him they were able to make pickups in other area's where they were needed and opened the door for Addai to step up.
2007-03-25 09:59:29 · 8 answers · asked by aricpelt 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
No, the Colts needed help on defense to get over the hump. Rhodes and Adai wanted to be there, James did not. The team was better for James leaving, he was to expensive to keep around.
2007-03-25 11:39:46 · answer #1 · answered by tannedknight45 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well u really can not tell but think Edge could not make it in on the goal line 3 years ago against the pats but addai did and rhodes did a lot in the super bowl. U can not say but i would say no
2007-03-25 17:11:01 · answer #2 · answered by All Hope is Gone 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I say yes. Unfortunately for James, the defense during his time there played nowhere near as well as they did during this year's playoffs. I still can't believe how well they tackled compared to the regular season.
2007-03-26 20:47:38 · answer #3 · answered by steve p 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there would be no real difference. addai and rhodes would do the same job as james.
2007-03-25 17:38:34 · answer #4 · answered by roman_emperor405 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no the mix of addai and rhodes was perfect tht is y this year the wont go cuz they lost rhodes
2007-03-25 17:05:41 · answer #5 · answered by firealarm92 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was taking up too much salary cap. With him in the backfield they wouldn't have mad it past the Patriots if even that far.
2007-03-25 17:02:54 · answer #6 · answered by Jesse 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who is Edgirrin James??? Learn to spell you tool...
2007-03-25 17:18:01 · answer #7 · answered by hockeydude25 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont think so. Passing will win .
2007-03-25 17:43:48 · answer #8 · answered by A P 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋