Much of the aid we give is given to appropriate toward specific policies that work for the US national interest, such as anti-drug policy in the US.
2007-03-25 09:39:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm a philanthropist and that i provide them a gorgeous to have a kinfolk. however the undertaking is loss of beginning administration and you apart from could ought to count variety that the richer a pair is, the fewer childrens they are going to have. Singapore's & Japan's inhabitants is shrinking and in some nicely stepped forward state in India women even have the backside beginning cost in the full India, because of the fact they placed occupation first and kinfolk later. it has have been given not something to do with having a to blame variety of little ones. What the undesirable do is have childrens with hopes that they are able to paintings, learn, possibly get a job in a richer united states of america and sustain the kinfolk from poverty. The undesirable do this for all time. seem, there's a nurse scarcity in the Philippines reason maximum can talk english and can bypass to earn greater in Britain or Australia. Now the undertaking is this plan for Somalis, Ethiopians, Kenyans & others replaced into interrupted by way of the famine. If the rains might come and vegetation flourish, have confidence me, their entire kinfolk could be harvesting and dushbags such as you does not make ignorant questions. you don't know something concerning the third worldwide, huh? you additionally should strengthen some thing: your brains. And the right thank you to apply them. additionally, who's "we"? i'm conversing for the european Union. eu is often beneficiant, domicile to the human rights and it does not be okay to easily enable them to starve. possibly there are additionally undesirable households in the 1st worldwide yet their childrens won't starve to loss of life on a each and on a daily basis foundation, ok? it rather is why we donate greater to the third worldwide. different than anorexic little ones, i haven't considered the different ravenous 1st worldwide citizen because of the fact they are ALREADY GETTING nutrients help. Gosh, you don't know something.
2016-10-19 21:49:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are many strategies used to gain influence over policy making. With aid to other countries, the USA has influence in the behavior of the government policies. The USA can remove aid as a form of punishment if the other country violates or participates in inappropriate behavior.
There is another reason. It benefits the USA to prevent countries from being impoverished. Poverty is the number 1 cause for violence and is a perfect environment for radical leadership to take over. Some examples of what happens in impoverished countries....genocide...arms buildup etc...
The USA does not provide aid for a Thank You. They provide it for world security.
2007-03-25 09:54:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by patricia 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The U.S. gives VERY LITTLE in the way of foreign aid. Where did you get your information about not being thanked. And why is a thank you necessary? The U.S. Government never thanked the Indians either. And you know how much aid they got: free poison blankets; free beads for land;
free haircuts and English lessons. THE INGRATES!
2007-03-25 10:13:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Question is, why does the US give foriegn aid?
Or, Why is congress willing to borrow money and give it to Israel so that they can throw Palestinians out of thier homes and bring in Foreign Jews?
If you help one group you alienate those who oppose them.
Ever since World War II we have set about alienating almost the entire world against us.
No Foriegn Aid
No Foriegn Alliances
No Foriegn Wars
2007-03-25 09:51:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Third world countries, have to repay the USA at a tremendous interest rate.
The USA can claim the foreign aid as an asset.
2007-03-25 09:45:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sometimes we give aid to bribe the leaders to behave themselves. Other times we give them aid to stop the spread of diseases, which could benefit us in the long run. I hope that our new presdient will give more aid to stop the third world population explosion and reduce the spread of aids instead of promotiing his abstinence only philosophy which does not do much good in most countries.
2007-03-25 09:48:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We even give aid to non third world countries like Isreal and then they don't even help out in Iraq!
2007-03-25 09:46:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Otherwise, some other country will give them aid, and maybe use it against us...Besides, it's the right thing to do, to assist the neady.....and build strong allies in new young democratic countries.
Did that help?
2007-03-25 09:41:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you sure about your facts? In my experience, US aid buys groveling loyalty, which is more than thank you. In Bangladesh, the entire elite have been bought by US money - and so the elite never, ever mention the Palestinian problem in public, and always obey the USA. Check out these links:
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_1546.shtml
http://www.axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/article_23393.shtml
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_iftekhar_070213_colonial_democracy.htm
If you want to know more, write!
2007-03-25 09:55:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by Kamal P 1
·
0⤊
0⤋