English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

Hey Honk,


The Starke treaty already requires them too.Russia or anyone who is a signatory of this treaty be able to inspect each others weapons. This compliance operation is ran by the United States Department of State(Nuclear Risk Reduction Center).

As for the raw supply of Uranium, I think the Department of Energy maintains the data on that.

What I think you should be aware of is that most of the United States Nuclear weapons are no longer made out of Uranium, but out of Hydrogen.

Hydrogen bombs are 1000x more powerful than Uranium weapons.

As for the United Nations, they try not to piss the Americans off, because they don't bite the hand that feeds the mouth.
The United States funds 22% of the Annual budget of the U.N. This makes the U.S. the largest single contributor.
So any action against the United States, is potentially an action against their own budget. And we all know " money talks and bullsh*t walks".

2007-03-25 11:15:22 · answer #1 · answered by William F 2 · 0 0

I think the UN should be kicked out of New York, and the building used as a homeless shelter. At least then the building will be used for something good.

2007-03-25 17:08:01 · answer #2 · answered by Deus Luminarium 5 · 0 0

I do not think it would hurt. But since the U.S. pays for 90% of the U.N. funding, it means that we would pay 90% of the cost to do an investigation.

2007-03-27 16:43:17 · answer #3 · answered by allen w 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers