It seems that they are trying to defuse assertions that Bush lied us into war by repeating Democratic accusations against Saddamn from the 1990's, but all this does is paint them as having told the same lies Bush told, doesn't it?
Do you get off the hook for just being a repeater of lies? Do enough repetitions really make lies true? If enough people of "both" parties believe it's true, does that mean it's not a lie after all when the evidence finally comes in?
I say the ALL lied, except for the great number who were ignored.
2007-03-25 09:07:53 · 6 answers · asked by oimwoomwio 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Never accept responsibility, always blame others and if all else fails assassinate the character of anybody that opposes you is the repuglican creed. .
2007-04-02 09:02:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here is what the Cons' buddies of the 1930's and 40's believed and apparently so do the cons.:
"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic, and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the state to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."
__Josef Goebbels, Nazi Minister of Propaganda
2007-03-25 09:22:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
politics is a vicious cycle where each party leaves the office and is blamed for the next party's mistakes. it is a no win situation for every new president. that is why the lies are misconstrued. each political situation in the world while a president is in office dictates what policy he or hopefully one day she, but not yet, issues and has to live with. hindsight is always used to make things seem like lies, in some cases yes they are lies, but neither party will ever admit to the other that they maybe just maybe made a mistake.
2007-04-01 15:12:05 · answer #3 · answered by mike_dooley49 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought he was acting on the information he was given by the people whose job it is to give him such information. That's not a lie.
What about the ten's of millions of women over there? You don't care about them do you sport.
2007-03-31 19:35:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
The same old dry stale argument he did this and he did that "we know what you liberals think" please get past it nothing can be done about it and not all republicans approve of what he has done so move on please...
2007-03-31 04:29:26 · answer #5 · answered by no one here gets out alive 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
what
2007-04-01 11:58:01 · answer #6 · answered by edawg9111 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋