IF he wins the nomination of his party, and IF he has Matt Blunt (gov of Missouri) as his vice president, and Blunt WERE, for some reason, made President, this nation would be in dire straights!
2007-03-25 08:17:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by jdnmsedsacrasac1 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
If he should win, the surprise will come when he takes off the conservative veneer and shows his true RINO colors.
As for uncorrupted the same could be said for a lot of our recent presidents. Many went from state to president in one step. Carter, Clinton, Reagan even the current president.
He works with the other party because he is mostly liberal. Witness the state he is from. I don't care how good you are, a real conservative is not going to be elected to a school board let alone Governor in that state.
I live in California. Our Governor is a RINO, so I think I can spot another one. Trust me this guy is dangerous to anyone wanting a conservative in the white house.
2007-03-25 08:30:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by gimpalomg 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I loathe that mendacity liberal Mitt Romney (who exceeded the tyrannical RomneyCare that forces Massachusetts citizens to purchase scientific insurance) even greater advantageous than the present socialist-in-chief. If I had to decide on between Romney and Obama, i might vote for Obama because of the fact Romney is the greater advantageous evil (confident, RINOs, not Democrat, are the greater severe enemy of our values). i don't care approximately the place Obama substitute into born, nor do very many human beings. it truly is in simple terms a conspiracy concept that leftists such as you hold occurring approximately. Obama has already made it clean that he won't launch his start certificates because of the fact he needs all 12 "birthers" to proceed speaking approximately that conspiracy so as that he can attempt to portray all conservatives as conspiracy theorists who think of he substitute into born in Kenya (the two that or he could be hiding some thing). i'll under no circumstances vote for Mitt Romney and that i'll inspire each Republican who believes in quite constrained government to do the comparable. We could defeat the RINOs till now we are able to start to defeat the less cheating leftists.
2016-12-19 13:37:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would have to disagree with you emphatically. I would prefer to see Tom Tencredo as president. He hasn't changed his stance on anything just because of some stupid polls, or anything else. He is the same today as he was 15 years ago and is not ashamed to say he is a conservative and believes in the sovereignty of the U.S. unlike 99% of the Dem. party and 70% of the Rep. party.
There is an ex gov. of Arkansas also in the running, but I can't remember his name. He also is a conservative.
2007-03-25 08:21:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by celticwarrior7758 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
He won the governorship of my state by being the fake, plastic ken doll that he has always been. Every idea and notion that he held to, he deserted right before he ran for governor. He previously ran for senator and lost because he forgot to desert his "beliefs." Now that he is running as a presidential Republican candidate, he has AGAIN "evolved" his thinking. His use of the word “evolved” is such bullshit. It’s “evolved” when a Republican does it but it’s “flip flopping” when a Democrat does it. And, his being mormon, make me skeptical of the fact that the language of evolution was ever in his vernacular to begin with.
Then there are his credentials. As governor he spent less than a year in a state he claimed to lead. His “financial genius” is so outdated and unimaginative. He just slashed the budget. As a result, we are now paying for it with increasing property taxes and additional fees (All fees, fares and tickets have gone up in MA). A real financial genius doesn’t rely heavily on the old slash and burn. A real financial genius would invest in technology, increase sales and remove barriers to opportunities. Technology is the only means by which the economy creates overall net gains and a real financial genius would know that. A financial genius would also increase sales by selling the greatness of America to tourists and not dealing with countries that impose tariffs on our goods. Finally, a real financial genius would round up all the illegal workers and send them home so that the money they send south of the border would stop escaping the country and circulate here. Romney himself had illegals working for him, and true to form, he claimed not to “know.” It’s simple econ 101. Invest in technology and you create industries and economies of scale. Increase sales and you increase real sustainable profits. Cost cut and you get band-aid profits. So if you are looking for a fake, ever “evolving,” bottom line eye-baller, then Romney is your man (or doll). I prefer not to live in a 1950s, Barbie world where the leader is Ken, we are distracted from the real issues by stupid culture war debates and everything is funded by debt. I’m looking for a leader who has vision to bring America forward into the 21st century, who recognizes that the real debate is the class war (the one in this country and the one other countries are conducting against us) and who is more concerned with the commonwealth of the country rather than the bottom line!
2007-03-28 03:56:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bostonian 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
He11 No!
Dude is a RINO through and through.
In his 1994 US Senate run, Romney backed two gun-control measures strongly opposed by the National Rifle Association and other gun-rights groups: the Brady Bill, which imposed a five-day waiting period on gun sales, and a ban on certain assault weapons.
2007-03-25 08:14:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
He scares the **** out of me. Maybe it's his resemble to Robert Chambers, the preppy murderer. I don't know, but that guy gives off creepy vibes. I wouldn't want to sit down and have a beer with him or meet him in a dark alley, never mind having him for president!
2007-03-29 03:35:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Curious 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mitt Romney would make an excellent President..And he would definitely restore dignity and honesty to the White House and Government in general
2007-03-25 08:23:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by J Montana 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
I have been watching ALL canidates,,IMPORTANT POINT<<
2007-03-25 08:17:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by fivefootnuttinhuny 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
He will allow every man to have multiple wives, and young ones too! The down side is that he will bring back prohibition.
2007-03-25 14:01:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋