Why do the liberals continue to harp on the President lied?

Question

There are audio,video,written documents of Bill Clinton,Hillary Clinton,Senator Kennedy,Senator Kerry,many other liberal democrats who said that Sadam was a threat before Bush even got elected..,this was back in 96 when CLinton bombed Iraq..,are the liberals that ignorant to proof of what was said???Why are you ignoring the fact they said these things?Come on.

Oh my,the intelligence is overwhelming

Clinton was impeached on lying to the grand jury,not from getting a ********.

Bush had to get congressional votes.,which Hillary and Clinton and Kerry voted on go to war with Iraq.So Bush didnt pull the trigger.

Its amazing to see how people know the facts here.Didnt they teach you people how to research and investigate and look up facts???

It doesnt matter what Clinton lied about..,you dont lie to a grand jury..,bottom line.

Answer 1

I don't think people are angry because he lied.
They are angry with the way the 'war' has been fought.
No planning, no vision, too many killed and maimed.
Four years later?

Answer 2

The point of view that liberals tend to have is that we aren't extremely concerned about your personal life so long as you do a good job as President. Yes, Clinton lied -- and many people think he was being awfully stupid for it. But Clinton's lie didn't hurt anyone but himself.

Although Bush hasn't been cheating on Laura (as far as we know), he's been a terrible president. His administration has consistently lied, ignored reality, and hidden facts from the rest of the U.S. When your President speaks, you should trust him (or her). Both Clinton and Bush broke that trust. But Bush is much worse in most of our eyes because his lies and stupidity caused one war and may be leading to others. All Clinton lied about was sex.

Answer 3

3000 dead and many thousands wounded and maimed....they served and sacrificed and the commander in chief sent them into harm's way not to protect America, but for some other arcane reason that is in no way supported by the facts as we know them.

Ask yourself why in November 2002, it was suddenly so urgent that Iraq comply with UN Provisions which they had been ignoring for years?? Answer....there is no good reason.

The commander in chief decided that finishing the Taliban and finding Osama Bin Laden just wasn't important enough to require our full attention...nope he had to invade a country which had nothing to do with 9/11 for reasons that cannot be justified.

History will record the deceptions which Mr. Bush and his Administration foisted upon the American people.

If it doesn't bother you that the president lied and deceived the American people...then bully for you...it bothers me greatly.

Answer 4

Why is it that whenever Cons try to defend Bush they don't DEFEND BUSH but start the childish "Well, Clinton did this or that"?

When Bush lies he can be believeable. He has had a lifetime of practice. Practice makes perfect. That is why so many people have believed him. Later facts have surfaced that expose the lies and so people wind up changing their stance or opinion on things.

People call Bush a liar because he is. He wouldn't know the truth if it jumped up and bit him in the A@@.

Answer 5

So are you saying that the democrats you mention were lying while Bush was not? Or are you saying that they were all lying?

I am perfectly aware of all of the quotes on "both" sides. The fact remains that only Bush pulled the trigger that got us into the mess we're in now, and to try to imply that he was somehow duped by the Democrats into rushing off to war is absurd at best.

Answer 6

Congress only went along because they believed Bush's lies -- SH wasn't behind 9/11, nor did he have his finger poised above a set of nukes pointed at us.

Bush used his lies to commit mass murder and other gross violations of human rights -- in violation of International Law (as well as all principles of human decency).

Clinton didn't completely destroy a country, and torture and rape tens of thousands of people.

Bush has still refused to admit to the lies that have cost more than 600,000 lives -- and counting.

Answer 7

Noone denies that Saddam was a threat. So are number of world leaders like Kim Jong Ill. However, it was the manner in which we entered and the spin on the reasons why we entered.

It's also hard to understand why Republicans impeached Bush over fellatio and are ignoring greater lies to the American public that have killed 3000+.

Answer 8

ever see a chicken lose a large feather that leaves a small
bloodspot on it's wing ? if you don't get it out of the chicken
yard soon, it'll be literally pecked to death by the flock before
nightfall . Chicken Politicians ? -- any questions ?

Answer 9

Here we go again,, a Republican attempting to justify the lies of Bush and his condoning the lies of his administration.

Good God,, what is wrong with those of you who do not like the truth,, so you bring up the sins of the past.

Eve gave Adam a forbidden Apple to taste,, therefore all women must be evil temptresses.

Cane slayed his own brother, therefore all men must be murderers.

It does not matter to Republicans that their government leaders have betrayed them,, because other leaders have betrayed them in the past.

of course,, this makes perfect sense,,,,,,,,
WAKE UP,, your in a Limbaugh brainwash,,,
WAKE UP,, your in a Hannity excuse warp,,,
WAKE UP,, your President and all his men have LIED to you,, they have betrayed you,, robbed and raped you,,

WAKE UP,, your in a daze,, a walking coma,,,,,,

Answer 10

The important thing to remember is that while the Democrats which you name knew Hussein was a threat, they also knew that he was not a threat that they could easily eliminate. Which is why they took action to contain him rather than to depose him outright.