Are Americans aware terrorists have endorsed Bush for president?

Question

FOX NEWS EXCLUSIVE

The statement tells American voters that Abu Hafs al-Masri supports the re-election campaign of President Bush: "We are very keen that Bush does not lose the upcoming elections." The statement said Abu Hafs al-Masri needs what it called Bush's "idiocy and religious fanaticism" because they would "wake up" the Islamic world.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,114489,00.html

MORE TERRORISTS FOR BUSH

Al Quaeda group officially backs Bush
"The statement said it supported U.S. President George W. Bush in his reelection campaign, and would prefer him to win in November rather than the Democratic candidate John Kerry, as it was not possible to find a leader "more foolish than you (Bush), who deals with matters by force rather than with wisdom."

In comments addressed to Bush, the group said:

"Kerry will kill our nation while it sleeps because he and the Democrats have the cunning to embellish blasphemy and present it to the Arab and Muslim nation as civilisation."

"Because of this we desire you (Bush) to be elected."

http://in.news.yahoo.com/040317/137/2c226.html

SECULARS FOR KERRY, FUNDIES FOR BUSH
The most pro-Kerry, he said, are the former Saddam Hussein loyalists — Ba'ath Party members and others who think Washington might scale back its ambitions for Iraq if Mr. Kerry wins, allowing them to re-enter civic life.
The most pro-Bush, he said, are the foreign extremists. "They prefer Bush, because he's a provocative figure, and the more they can push people to the extreme, the better for their case."

http://www.washtimes.com/world/20041027-121030-7792r.htm

Answer 1

Great links, and great question. It's amazing to me how some people can't see how our unethical war in Iraq has only solidified the radical muslim movement. Sadaam was a jerk, no doubt...but he killed terrorists. He would not tolerate them in his country...he was a threat to his own people, sure. But now his people (and those who have flooded in from Iran, Syria, etc) are now a threat to us...especially since they are living in a place where there is a vacuum of power.

Answer 2

This got the stupid Bush sycophants right between the eyes! Good work! I love the lame comments some of them have already made. Bush can't be elected again? What does that have to do with anything? These statements by the terrorists were obviously made before the last election, back when Cheney was saying that the terrorists were favoring Kerry. I think one of the symptoms of becoming a Republican is a strong abhorence to the truth much as a vampire avoids sunlight.

Answer 3

whilst I agree that Bush has no longer been the worst president in American history, to call him between the ideal is slightly untimely. The business enterprise of "good Christian Values" interior the White residing house will leave with him. Any business enterprise he made is momentary and the legacy would be short-lived and remembered in a different way in keeping with who follows and how Iraq finally settles. The lengths Bush has long previous to guard this us of a might or will possibly no longer have overstepped some obstacles. i've got faith in a time of war that he might do this and be completely positive with it, besides the fact that, as quickly as the war has ended, if the measures he put in place do no longer stand to reason or our shape it may all be for naught. The tax cuts helped better than purely the middle classification. maximum each physique benefited from it, in spite of if those no longer used to a providence probable did no longer comprehend what to do with it. i'm no longer as specific it "saved the economic gadget" besides the fact that it actual did help pull us out of a recession. Many presidents have tried classes for the academic gadget...different than positioned extra emphasis on the fundamentals. Bush's application supplies a manner of measuring, yet while colleges concentration extra on the attempt than the coaching of the youngsters, there's a concern.

Answer 4

I'm fairly sure that even the spokesmen for Al Quaida are aware that Bush cannot run again. Why would you listen to and accept anything that terrorists might tell you? Don't be so gullible.

Answer 5

And your taking the word of someone backing Bush/Kerry election ? two years later or for this November? when both are not running...... Then I guess you should. though your support is telling you to vote for Bush...

Answer 6

That would have pertinent 4 years ago DUMBASS. I guess it never occurred to you that they made those statements to make people NOT WANT to vote for him.

Answer 7

Doesn't mean a thing..Presdient Bush cannot run again....This Liberal Learning Experience was brought to you by the average citizen

Answer 8

Makes no difference....he can't run again. Were you aware of that?

Answer 9

How odd ... a terrorist supporting a terrorist....

Answer 10

Are you aware that you are unaware.