English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What would Ancient Athens democrays have been like? What would they have considered democracy?

2007-03-25 06:42:03 · 5 answers · asked by satch 1 in Politics & Government Government

5 answers

Only free men were allowed to take part. Women and slaves were excluded.

It's worth remembering that until recently (e.g. 1918 in the case of the UK) many democracies did not include women, while slaves in the US did not have the vote.

Those allowed to take part in the ancient Greek democratic process could argue and debate as much as they liked until a decision had been taken by the elected representatives, after which the decision was binding on all - including those excluded from the process.

Trial by jury was practised and the juries were chosen by a lottery system.

Not democracy as we know it today but it was a better - if only just - alternative to dictatorship.

2007-03-25 07:35:36 · answer #1 · answered by squeaky guinea pig 7 · 1 0

From what I've read, only male citizen landowners were allowed to vote. So, it was a democracy of sorts. But not in any sense where all the people were equally allowed to participate.

2007-03-25 06:44:53 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0 0

What had led to the advance of democratic government in historical Athens? traditionally, the army have been purely crammed via rich men who had sufficient wealth to have some cavalry(chariots, weapons, and so on.). by using fact the army had the great dependence on the cavalry, the known weren't allowed to connect in by using fact of their lacks of equipment. the priority with it exchange into that the rich men slightly confirmed a small proportion of the inhabitants. whilst Athens exchange into commencing as much as lose the battles against enemies, e.g. Romans, the King desperate to enhance his military via welcoming the known men, in spite of their lacks of equipment. He used the word, "prefer extra infantrymen? shrink the abilities". the end results of this exchange into that the army exchange into turning out to be extra desirable and bigger and sufficient to handle the enemies. in a protracted time, (like the French Revolution), the known infantrymen discovered the that they had entitled no rights to rule no longer purely like the rich ones. So by using fact maximum persons of the warriors have been consumer-friendly men, hence they revolted against truthfully the ruling. This confirmed that the Athens grew to alter right into a place the place exchange into ruled via consumer-friendly men and that they now entitled to the rights of being electorate. additionally they may well be allowed to vote. yet in contrast to rapidly, the ladies human beings, slaves and foreigners weren't allowed to accomplish that. The entitled votes' names have been positioned right into a field. each 365 days, extra or much less, 500 names have been picked out to handle the tax, agency and fees of Athens. the huge area of this era exchange into the militia effect.

2016-12-08 10:53:31 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

it was a real deomocracy and thats why Alexander didnt take over the whole world.

2007-03-25 07:10:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

just like today, corrupt, and hijacked by the elite, richest people in the world.

2007-03-25 06:49:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers