English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I love the way it's said "Bush kicked butt after 9/11"....
Problem is, he kicked the wrong butts. IRAQ had NOTHING to do with 9/11.. So where is the justice in that?

2007-03-25 06:41:44 · 14 answers · asked by Not Me!! 5 in Politics & Government Politics

I'm not saying he kicked butt after 9/11...the republicans say it...

2007-03-25 06:52:59 · update #1

Nicki: I totally agree with you...too bad other people are too dumb to see it.

2007-03-25 07:02:04 · update #2

14 answers

First I agree with you, but Bush has never kicked any ones
Butt, remember he was cheerleader in College. He runs from a fight but sends troops in to the wrong country for Da Da and Oil. The people of Iraq voted yesterday 3/4% that didn't want us in Iraq , why stay and be killed if they don't want you. Let them fight their on war that is what they want so let them get after it and bring our troops home tomorrow. We should have stayed out of Iraq, they loved Saddam. Do you really believe with Saddam gone they are better off, they had electricity, food, carnivals, no terrorists, and they had good schools. In my opinion they were better off before we invaded them. Killing them, raping them, their homes are gone. No wonder they want us to leave them alone.

2007-03-25 06:58:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

As far as i know, Dubya didn't kick anything. It was the military which did the butt kicking. Kind of like when the mob boss says "trow a beatin on 'im." Bush couldn't kick a can down the street without help.

And we still haven't found OBL, and we still haven't brought freedom to the Iraqi people.

So he's not doing very well, now, is he?

We've been looking for OBL longer than we were *in* WWII.

2007-03-25 08:48:43 · answer #2 · answered by Charlie S 6 · 2 1

You mean he got his butt kicked in Iraq. For over 4 years. We been in there longer than WWII. Took out more reporters than in Vietnam. Took out over 3000 soldiers. He got butt kicked at home for no WMD, took lot of heat for Walter Reed scandals.

He's been getting his butt kicked around so much I can't believe he's just not quiting.

Everybody knew we can beat Saddam. That's the easy part. I could have said 'go' and our army would get it done. It takes more than that to run a war.

2007-03-25 14:58:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Because Benghazi was pure result of incompetence, negligence and carelessness. The administration only had 1 thing in mind -- defeating Romney. Even if at means at the cost of the 4 slain diplomats. Providing additional security to the consulate in Benghazi meant taking time off from the campaign trail - And that was something Obama administration would never agree to If Obama was to run the country the way he ran his campaigns, he would be the most successful president ever in US history and even Bill Clinton would appear too small in comparison.

2016-03-29 04:09:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bush kicked butt after 9/11,,,,
But now where is he,,,,,,?
Hiding behind his desk, and wondering how can he pass the amnesty bill for the illegals.
Bush loves Mexico and Mexicans.

2007-03-25 06:50:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Iraq was a supporter of terrorism. Terrorism is not just confined to Al Queda. And Bush has a policy of PREVENTING terrorism by taking out the threat before it makes its presence here.

2007-03-25 06:47:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Bush doesn't care about justice or the law.

You say he kicked but. Fine. But he did it illegally, when he could have done all of the same things within existing laws.

Why does that deserve anyone's praise?

2007-03-25 06:45:53 · answer #7 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1 2

So, Bush should have ignored all of the intelligence that he was given from our CIA, FBI, Homeland Security, British intelligence, Soviet intelligence, Israeli intelligence, French and German intelligence, stating that Saddam had WMD and was poised to "attack" the US and our interests while we were "wounded"? And if he did ignore the intelligence, and we were attacked again, what would your complaint be then? Come on now! Give peace a chance!

2007-03-25 06:47:29 · answer #8 · answered by MaHaa 4 · 1 3

We kicked Saddam's butt for a different reason. No one except liberal jelly heads ever said that the 2 were connected.

2007-03-25 06:52:42 · answer #9 · answered by Mother 6 · 2 3

i like bush. he has done nothing but what he thought was best for the country. if you think Kerry would be better suited for this country then OK let little ****** people run the streets and instead of going to war then just bend over for the enemy.

2007-03-25 06:57:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers