The National Parties are a shell of their previous existence.
Speech has been limited.
2007-03-25 06:21:17 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It was a stupid idea to begin with, also unconstitutional,
As is plain to see it has not done what it was supposed to do, limit the amount of money given to political parties. Why the President did not veto it is a mystery. And of course the Supreme Court seems to live in some olympian heights where the problems of us ordinary mortals can not be seen.
2007-03-25 06:29:59 · answer #1 · answered by hironymus 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course. Congress shall make no law abridging freedom of speech. Plain and simple.
2007-03-25 06:31:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Every one expected that it would have been shot down by the supreme court, including the sponsors. It should have been.
2007-03-25 06:24:27 · answer #3 · answered by Sgt 524 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋