can we have a united world justice system.?

Question

couldnt we have representives from every country in the world to sit in and listen to disputes,such as america v iraq,iran afganistan etc,look at and examine the facts and evidence and find out the truth,or do you think america would not allow this,there would be no need for weapons or wars,any country found guilty would be dealt with by all the other countries,

dont know how many countries are in UN.but im talking about stopping wars and all countries joining together to enforce laws and only using fisty cuffs,so usa would not be able to invade countries or if iran was wrong then they would be punished,i think im trying to say we the people of this planet stop all this nuclear weapons stuff,but im not sure america would allow it

Answer 1

The sort of united world justice system kind of exists already. China managed to get the North Koreans to tone down the nuclear thing, China were able to do this because the Americans (for once) twiddled their thumbs and bit their lips knowing that their usual wild west approach to 'situations' was not an option where N Korea was concerned - this could be why Iran feels the need to go nuclear - The Americans are champing at the bit to fcuk up big time in Iran, they've no time for wisdom and dialogue, "stuff that, we're in a movie!" "Geronimooooooooooo!"

Answer 2

Well then, how will you solve the problem like Sharia? The UN is toothless, it pretends to be important but in the end it requires a few powerful countries to deal with the situation before handing anything over to the ineffectual troops the UN manages to dredge up from goodness knows where. I seem to remember in the Balkans, the UN watched as civilians were taken and marched off to their death. No, the present system isn't perfect but I wouldn't the Iranian or North Korean despots telling the UK what to do, thank you very much.

Answer 3

Some people feel the need to insult others. They can't seem to help themselves ...

I think it is a good idea. I think you are onto something about the US not allowing harmonious negotiation.

I think you might be saying that we deliberately encourage animosity, to get a wedge in every corner of the globe.

However, it is not just the USA. It is give and take. We do a lot of harm around the globe, but imagine what the world would be like if the US dropped its arms and kicked back.

... Then there would be even more complaining.

Answer 4

that would be very good. but the problem is that not everyone thinks the same, some might agree with a few things and some may not. and if we did the country found guilty of a crime or something would retaliate with what but with a war so its really hard to dispose of weapons even when we have that united world system.

Answer 5

You actually would like to give countries like Iran, Syria, Liberia, and China a say in how we run our country? The Western World is far more civilized than many other areas of the world, and I wouldn't want our justice system degraded.

Answer 6

The intrinsic problem with global integration is that when push comes to shove you can not reasonably expect any country to act to its detriment to better another. This is why the UN has problems. This is why the EU has problems. Can you really tell me that the British would support a bill that raised taxes in the UK to build bridges in France?

Answer 7

no, because even the united nations can't do a proper job policing the world. and with all the cultural differences and mixed interests of all the nations of the world, it would be an impossible task. even the 10 basic human rights is not enforced throughout the world.

Answer 8

You're basically talking about non-binding arbitration or mediation between countries.

We have that already. It's called the United Nations.

Answer 9

U.N. was orginized to do this. DUH!

When the world becomes Muslim, the Koran will rule.

A judge in Missouri has recently ruled, in favor of a Muslim, that the Koran permits a husband to abuse his wife.
US law no longer applies, hmmmmm?

Answer 10

Maybe it could be chaired by her majesty queen elizabeth 2 unelected ,disgustingly rich ,poor people ignorer.