The whole period of evolution of man on earth, since he was a unicellular organism until he acquired the graceful and beautiful form it has now, can be condensed and observed in the nine months of gestation in the womb. In that environment, an aquatic medium, life begins as a unicellular organism and takes the shape of a beautiful baby at the end.
Life on earth started in the sea. An aquatic medium like the womb. Khalil Gibran says: "There must be something strangely sacred in salt. It is in our tears and in the ocean." That unicellular organism was however always destined to be a man and not anything else.
During the gestation the fetus may resemble a tadpole or may look like the fetus of an ape. Nevertheless it always was and had the potential to become a human being. So even though fossil remains may prove that human beings at some point during their evolution were balancing themselves from trees from their own tails, they were always human beings and not apes.
What do you think?
2007-03-25 05:40:07 · 10 answers · asked by apicole 4 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
I am not saying we evolved from apes! We were always human beings even if at some point we looked like apes. We were always a different species.
2007-03-25 07:31:31 · update #1
Evolution didn't happen... it is still happening. By your justification we are not humans. We just aren't evolved to what we are eventually going to be.
So I guess we are gonna have to wait and see. :)
2007-03-25 05:47:49 · answer #1 · answered by Chris P 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes we are not coming from apes. Evolutionists also claim that apes and humans evolved separately. (Then, how and from which organism did we evolve???).
When you look at genetic code in all organisms, all of them have that code, and the balance in their cells (think about 1 million chemicals in a cell working without any trouble) and with their environment, and also even though they do not know what they are, where they come, they live mostly with peace.
---------
The theory of evolution is a theory that fails at the very first step. The reason is that evolutionists are unable to explain even the formation of a single protein. Neither the laws of probability nor the laws of physics and chemistry offer any chance for the fortuitous formation of life.
Does it sound logical or reasonable when not even a single chance-formed protein can exist, that millions of such proteins combined in an order to produce the cell of a living thing; and that billions of cells managed to form and then came together by chance to produce living things; and that from them generated fish; and that those that passed to land turned into reptiles, birds, and that this is how all the millions of different species on earth were formed?
Even if it does not seem logical to you, evolutionists do believe this fable.
However, it is merely a belief-or rather a false faith-because they do not have even a single piece of evidence to verify their story. They have never found a single transitional form such as a half-fish/half-reptile or half-reptile/half-bird. Nor have they been able to prove that a protein, or even a single amino acid molecule composing a protein, could have formed under what they call primordial earth conditions; not even in their elaborately-equipped laboratories have they succeeded in doing that. On the contrary, with their every effort, evolutionists themselves have demonstrated that no evolutionary process has ever occurred nor could ever have occurred at any time on earth.
2007-04-01 23:08:30 · answer #2 · answered by Genetikçi 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Mutation, competition, reproduction. You're wrong when you write "they were always human being and not apes." There was/is no foreordained conclusion. Using aesthetic judgments like "graceful" and "beautiful" is just human narcissism. The dodo and the Neanderthal probably considered themselves graceful and beautiful but, alas, are now extinct.
2007-03-25 06:02:24 · answer #3 · answered by Josh T 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
as some others have said its in the good book BUT we did kind of come from apes because of the story of cane and able cane killed able so how do u think we came to be if there was only 1 person left on the earth I will tell u all there was ape like humans and cane got with 1 of them you all know it takes 2 to make a baby how else could it have happen cause cane was the only one left acording to the good book the lord him self said that he made all kinds of anmials and beast that is why we are finding ape like humans because they were there....
2007-03-29 12:25:49 · answer #4 · answered by ALLEN P 1 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Humans didn't evolve from apes. We evolved from the same ancestor as apes.
2007-03-25 05:46:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
it did not thats just scientist useing inaccurate equipment that they made and tested on now aday things, so the old things don't really come out right and the skuls and other evidence is from other species before us not evolved ones
2007-03-25 05:48:33 · answer #6 · answered by Mujahid E 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
yah hello, have you not heard of a little religion called Christianity? you should read the Bible; the first chapter is titled Genesis. the very first couple of pages will answer your questions.
2007-03-29 00:24:33 · answer #7 · answered by jsf19872005 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
The earth did not evolve and neither did man. Read Genesis!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-03-25 05:48:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
we did not evolve from apes. read the Bible.
2007-03-25 07:25:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
it never happend. we where never apes.
2007-03-25 05:43:58 · answer #10 · answered by politebat2001 2 · 1⤊ 5⤋