English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

do u think that the U.S will attack IRAN and is it goin to be an easy 1 like the IRAQI war when it first started?

2007-03-25 05:34:05 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

12 answers

IF Bush has some insight, he would not attack Iran ! but i doubt his this ability !! Iran is not an easy target like Iraq, they are much powerful than Iraq , because they don't ahve saddam with them who would open up the doors for US to get in Iran......they would have to face much more......Iran is a nuclear power, have some hold in gulf and they know enough how to use their sources of "Oil". if US had attacked Iran, iran would be open with my choices to use...they can get their army enter in Iraq and would get Iraq unstable, creating a problem for US, they can block the water transportation and thus the world trade would be effected....so US would have to face the world pressure as Iran would be justified in doing that, their nuclear stations are not easy to target as most of them are underground....... and most importantly the army Chief mr perterson is aware of this facts he would not take the responsibility of the failure in this attack and that would be problem for bush to handel..........just prediction, can't say with conviction....as Bush is an unpredictable person !!he believes that even all the american nation get against him and he is left with his dog only to support him, he would not change his policies for Iraq..so can't say about him but this war would not be an easy one !

2007-03-25 09:18:21 · answer #1 · answered by ★Roshni★ 6 · 0 0

I don’t think that US want war now even though this might be an option depending on the situation…I think that maybe if UN isolated Iran due to their nuclear program. There is a possible that Iran will not tolerate this and do an act against that …this maybe will lead to war. For me I hope there will be no war we in Middle East get enough of it. I hope the world leaders could solve the problems peacefully and diplomatically.

2007-03-25 13:38:31 · answer #2 · answered by Chem 3 · 0 0

Possibly. Maybe even the U.K. or Israel first. It will be much more difficult to succeed in IRAN. The military is inspired, larger, independent and well funded. The provocative attitude of President Mahmud AHMADI-NEJAD can only lead to conflict. Mr Ahmadinejad told some 3,000 students in Tehran that Israel's establishment had been a move by the West against the Islamic world. He was addressing a conference entitled The World without Zionism and his comments were reported by the Iranian state news agency Irna. "As the Imam said, Israel must be wiped off the map," he said, referring to Iran's late revolutionary leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.

Until our entire world learns to accept and respect the religious differences and cultural diversity that exist between us we can not progress.

2007-03-25 14:52:26 · answer #3 · answered by petriw 2 · 1 0

The US should have invaded Iran instead of Iraq. They were the bigger threat.
On a related note - I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if Israel attacked Iran before the US does. The Iranian president has made it very clear that he wants to 'push the Israelies into the sea" and has made comments like, "let them (Israelies) be no more". I don't think the Israelis are going to sit and wait for their enemies to come after them. One thing for sure...be it America or Israel, whoever attacks Iran will have to deal with the Iranians AND the Russians since the two are such strong allies these days.

2007-03-25 12:45:45 · answer #4 · answered by Mr.Longrove 7 · 0 1

No, Bush is going to veto the military budget, so support for troops in Iran and Iraq will dry up. He will then blame the Democrats for not voting endless resources (flesh and blood as well as profiteering monies) under his terms for his war (which he now says is "My war"). I assume that Iran would be Oliver North's war, since he armed them.

He wants to teach us a lesson by killing off as many U.S. servicemen as he can.

2007-03-25 12:59:46 · answer #5 · answered by Gaspode 7 · 0 1

I think U.S will attack IRAN because they need oil. Then they will attack Russia because they need russian natural resourses and so on and so forth.

2007-03-25 14:05:38 · answer #6 · answered by zinam 3 · 0 1

Well there's oil in iran. and the us cannot tolerate anyone having a nuclear development program without their permision, so i'm afraid yes

2007-03-25 12:42:42 · answer #7 · answered by Lukas H 2 · 1 1

I think it's very doubtful. We are stretched pretty thin, plus, unlike Iraq, "there's more trhan one way to skin a cat."

2007-03-25 12:43:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

my 8 ball says highly unlikely

2007-03-25 15:41:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No chance in election year.

2007-03-25 12:41:55 · answer #10 · answered by manjunath_empeetech 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers