English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This is evident that this is thermite. It is not something that you would find in an office building unless it is DELIBERATELY planted there during the power down in WTC 1 week prior to the attacks!!!
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=545886459853896774

2007-03-25 05:28:18 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Other - News & Events

5 answers

It's clear that jet fuel would not cause this effect. It looks a lot like metal cutting... The building seems to explode at the earlier stages. A simple collapse would not dissentigrate concrete. There must have been explosives and metal cutting materials used. Please query: "911 Truth Movement" for more great videos and interviews with witnesses.

The existence of thermite (or thermate) is one of the assertions by Professor Steven Jones, a distinguished professor of physics at BYU. He has 13 salient points that have not been explained.

In support of this assertion, it appears that these buildings collapsed in a way that was never seen before except in planned demolition. The 9/11 Commission never interviewed firemen and other eye witnesses who indicated that there were timed explosions within the building and sub-basement. The commission also made factual errors such as the following:

- The twin towers had a hollow core and was supported almost entirely on the outside. FACT: The twin towers were designed with 47 huge support towers internal to the structure. The steel was removed within a few weeks of the collapse preventing forensic examination.

- The twin towers pancaked one floor after the next. FACT: Such a collapse could not happen at free fall speed, the internal structure must be destroyed first.

- The collapse was caused by fire. FACT: Despite bloggers uninformed remarks. No steel framed buildings have ever collapsed from fire alone. One 9/11 the twin towers were said to have collapsed from fire. Although the commission did not even mention WTC 7, it also collapsed the same day and this building had a totally different design and was reinforced. (refuting the concept of a design flaw in this third building).

Families of victims have cried out for answers to specific questions for specific people, but congress managed to sidestep these questions. Most who have raised questions, have been ignored. Celebrities, who are more difficult to ignore, have in some cases been discredited by mass media.

Unfortunately, there is a virtual news blackout on this story. Why?

2007-03-25 05:55:21 · answer #1 · answered by Skeptic 7 · 2 2

Your frame holds a finite quantity of semen at any given time. Once that's depleted, it takes time for it to provide extra. The transparent-ish stuff method you will have "tired the tank." Just take it convenient for an afternoon or 2 you'll be quality. And you would wish to keep in mind utilising a penis well being creme too. Not most effective will this creme preserve your epidermis from traditional masturbation problems like dryness and chafing, however it is going to give a number of key nutrients down there as good. Your penis will likely be tremendous-healthful hence. Hope this data is helping.

2016-09-05 15:23:47 · answer #2 · answered by erlebach 4 · 0 0

No, the thermite thing have been disputed before. No thermites. And even if it is thermite who knows if it came from Al Queda dude?

Unless you're expert yourself consider other side of debate too.
http://www.debunking911.com/thermite.htm

Have you even heard of thermite before this whole 9/11 thing? You know sometimes thermite can be used in welding? To build steal frames?

If you see TV commercial about instant cure for cancer, GET rich NOW!, do you believe them all?

2007-03-25 15:30:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

of course it was planted there. only a fool would think a cave man could fool the Americans, norad, usaf, tracking technology we are not publicly aware of yet, echelon. they must think were quite stupid to believe the cave man theory.

2007-03-25 05:33:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Read and learn:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

2007-03-25 11:24:56 · answer #5 · answered by robot_hooker 4 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers