Like how they used to when they first started the seperate brands. You would never see a RAW guy on Smackdown or vica versa. That way when there was an interpromotional match at say Wrestlemania, it would be that much special.
2007-03-25 05:09:15 · 7 answers · asked by jm42445 5 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Yes and No.No because they could make some pretty good matches together.Yes because it would be chaos with both brands together.
2007-03-25 05:13:31 · answer #1 · answered by KingOfDaSouth 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I disagree. I think they should combine all 3 brands to one major-brand. That way there is only 1 true champion, a hell of a lot of competition and the ability to make titles everywhere and GREEAT factions & stables. It may suck though as there would be about 70 wrestlers.... therefore the branding works. But if they make inter-premotional matches more often it would rule.
2007-03-28 13:05:02 · answer #2 · answered by Eternal Carnage 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They should keep them seperated because when they do come together at major PPV events then the excitment is just that much greater.
2007-03-25 12:16:21 · answer #3 · answered by metal_1134_head 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who cares? Wrestling is nothing more than coordinated theater with a pre-determined outcome that both participants are fully aware of... doesn't sound like a sport to me... sounds like bad acting.
Tax the poor !!!
2007-03-25 12:18:13 · answer #4 · answered by Scorpius 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no cuz they have the same story lines for months they should just combine them like back in the good old wwf days
2007-03-25 12:14:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well.i dot really know but here is a question about uor question.....is M
2007-03-25 12:14:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Yipen™ 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
YES.......Now I know all the rejects are on Friday and Tuesday night.....hahahahaha
2007-03-25 12:16:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋