2007-03-25 04:22:06 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Par for the course...not one liberal actually answered the question.
2007-03-25 05:58:19 · update #1
Less terrorism.
\
I stress less.
2007-03-25 04:24:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The chance of seeing a stable, liberated, democratic Middle East is as remote as the chance of George W. Bush saying or doing something intelligent.
Forget about it.
2007-03-25 04:58:55 · answer #2 · answered by marianddoc 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be fantastic to have the Muslim countries of the middle east be free of US and British and Israeli imperialism, and finally be stable and liberated. They will have to develop democracy on their own, once they are stable and liberated.
2007-03-25 04:28:45 · answer #3 · answered by Longhaired Freaky Person 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It doesn't exist in the Middle east never has existed. Never will exist. The Muslims are wired wrong.
The implications are war, continued war, and pillaging.
2007-03-25 04:33:50 · answer #4 · answered by andy r 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It would be far more difficult for Bush and his oily friends to suck $$ out of the Middle East.
Why do you think we inserted war into the Middle East once again? Chaos is good for exploitation.
By the way Hamas was elected democratically. Because to them, "terrorists" are "freedom fighters."
2007-03-25 04:27:23 · answer #5 · answered by Jedi 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Peace on earth goodwill to men in planet of apes.
Decode this lyrics "The morning after"
Like what we had after the Liberation of Freedom from world war two before independence that was lost with time in making a mess and misery out of living human kind in planet of apes.
Decode this lyrics "Yesterday once more"
The gifts of life which does not change with time but stay in time was lost with time after independence in planet of apes.
2007-03-25 04:32:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
The people would vote in religious leaders.
2007-03-25 04:27:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋