Why won't Congress Impeach Bush & Cheney for TREASON???

Question

They have broken upteen laws and violated numerous ethics in govt. Why aren't they being impeached. A scandal a week for a year and nothing ! ! !

Answer 1

Show your proof! You cannot impeach a President or Vice-President because you BELIEVE they have lied.

Answer 2

Obviously you don't understand what treason actually means. If you are thinking it simply means that one has lied, then you'd have to impeach every congressmen and govt official at one point or another Pres. Bush & Cheney haven't performed treason against America. You just don't like the war.

Answer 3

Cause they haven't done anything treasonous. Just because you don't agree with their policies doesn't mean that they can be impeached. Despite what you think, they haven't done anything wrong.

By the way, I wish they would impeach the democrat congress. If anyone is committing treason it's those hacks in the democrat party.

Answer 4

Your hatred of those two gentlemen cloud you on the definition of treason according to the United States Constitution.

Here is the definition of treason according to the United States Constitution Article III Section 3:

Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.


The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person attainted.

Your charges do not consider to be a charge of treason.

Answer 5

IF they were impeached, this country would be in turmoil. I do very much want them to be held accountable for what they've done, but don't see impeachment as being a prospect.

After all, the last possible impeachment was by the Republicans trying to get Clinton for his private life activities. Cheney and Bush's transgressions certainly are not of that magnitude! lol

Answer 6

I positioned partial blame in the process the Bush administration on the Democrats. in spite of everything, Bush signed that rubbish into regulation that Democrats despatched him. And the Democrats had administration of the two homes of Congress. Republicans have in basic terms the residing house. no longer the senate. Democrats had the two with Bush. yet you knew that this grew to become into no longer an identical. you in basic terms % to make stuff up.

Answer 7

They need a smoking gun to justify that kind of expenditure. If they're going to go through with it, they'll need concrete evidence and that won't be easy to find, since the Bush family are exceptional at cover-ups. It's logical to conclude that anyone with real dirt has been effectively bribed or blackmailed into silence and paper trails and the like have been shredded or otherwise destroyed. Yes, it sucks that they'll walk, but at least they'll walk away.

Answer 8

Sorry but you still can't impeach a person for "Not being the one I voted for" You are correct about a scandal a week over nothing but hey that's the press

Answer 9

name one law and state the law verbatim, not as you interpret it as far as a scandal, when the democrats yell "scandal" its the fools like yourself who take it for Gospel without even knowing the facts. stop believing in the sound bites the media feed you . they truly believe your stupid enough to believe it all.

Answer 10

And they wanted to impeach Clinton for a tryst in the Oval Office. Just goes to show how far the corruption of Republicans has gone.

I'm female, and if I was president I'd be doing it all over the White House, it would make my book more exciting! Whoops, their goes my election......

Answer 11

No act of treason has been committed. Therefore, there is no evidence of treason. "If the glove don't fit, you must acquit."
-