ladytaff you have a good point funny when ya think about it
2007-03-25 03:04:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Because the liberals, with all their wisdom, would sue the executioner and the state if an infection were to arise. And some how, the 9th Circuit would rule that an infection is cruel and unusual even for a corpse.
2007-03-25 03:32:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The needle is inserted long before poison is injected. If the excution is called off for any reason, the prisoner isn't going to get an infection.
2007-03-25 03:01:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
And why do they use a sterile needle? These are standard accepted medical practices which do not change, even if the desired end result is the termination of a life. Anything less would be construed as cruel and unusual punishment; the purpose of capital punishment is not to torture.
2007-03-25 03:00:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Curious1usa 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Germs at the site of injection could cause infection because you are creating a hole there where there isn't supposed to be one.
2007-03-25 03:06:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Amanda D 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
For ethical reasons.
There is already plenty of people who argue that the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment, not doing standard medical procedure would contribute to that argument.
2007-03-25 03:14:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by trin 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's a standard medical practice...Don't let doctors get out of the habit of doing that. Hospitals are dirty enough.
2007-03-25 03:00:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by ToYou,Too! 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
To clean the part where they were going to throw the dart in.
At the same time to distract attention from the pin prick in planet of apes.
Will feel the acohol and not the pin pricks in planet of apes.
2007-03-25 03:01:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
To appear caring.
2007-03-25 02:58:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
It's a habit.
2007-03-25 03:06:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by ♥ Cassie ♥ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋