should homoeopathic philosophy be simplified or not?

Question

this is with regards to organon and the philosophies laid by Dr.Hahnemann about how a physician must practise homoeopathy

Answer 1

i would say no, as simplified often means restricted, leaving out possibilities in each individual situation, by each physician,,,,,, homeopathic medicine is actually not simple at all, it involves no set medicine or standard,,,,, but the physicians observations of particular methods and how they apply to a particular individual,,,,the sum of all they know and see,,,, it involves not just the immediate reaction, but long term effects,,,,,,,,
so i am not exactly certain of what you mean by simplified,,,,,,

Answer 2

I have been working on that project for the last few years. I think it is very important that healing can be done with more ease and certainty.

Homeopathy is very effective, but difficult to practice. And i believe it can and should be easier.

My main thought is that homeopathy though it claims to treat "the patient not the disease" uses pathological symptoms for its diagnosis. I think that a lot of miraculous healing happens when people forget about the disease, and just be themselves. So i am searching for remedies that work on the positive angle of being yourself rather than the negative of the problem.

However all of this is really about practice. The philosophy of homeopathy is very simple, and i have not challenged it anywhere - "like cures like" "patient not disease" "less is more" - that about sums it all up i think. It is hard to see how the philosophy could be any simpler.