World war III?

Question

What do you think? Will someday happen world war III? Because of all the violence, hate, disagreements (...) in the whole world...

Answer 1

It is bound to happen! Sad but it is the fate.
Day by day we are moving towards it, and you are correct the reason will be (rather is) violence, hate and disagreement.

The speed with which we are moving the accident is bound to happen.

Answer 2

Honey, that's just civil strife.

It's just sad that some people have falling behind the times in believing that what's going on NOW is World War III, when in fact, that was a *nuclear war* with our old enemy, the USSR.

Now, since that's past, we could either have a Global Civil War, or a Fourth World War. But it won't be called WWIII.

Answer 3

for me personally, the events of iraq which has gone on for 5 years now mark what i see as world war 3 and the consequences have been and are much dire than they were in 1939 in world war 1 and a few years later with world war 2

Answer 4

When a country like Iran turns murderous, you can no longer reason with them. Just as there was no reasoning with Sadaam, Hitler, Tojo. The only way to bring reason back into their brains is to kill them. Unfortunately. Like a cancer, you have to cut it out before it kills you.

Answer 5

Yes I do believe it's coming. It's just a matter of some event to set it all off.

Answer 6

Yes my dear it`s a coming soon to much stuff happening with iran..

Answer 7

NOPE... THEY JUST NEED ATTENTION AND THEY'RE GETTING IT.... AFRAID WITH THE BEHAVIOR OF IRAN? THEY CAN WAGE WAR BUT WILL THEY? CHINA AND RUSSIA AND JAPAN CAN STOP THEM... WHAT MORE IF THE G8 WAGED WAR AGAINST IRAN? THEY HAVE THE MEANS AND THE AUTHORITY....

Answer 8

Iran is dealing with two issues. First, Iran has captured 15 British sailors. Second, Iran has refused to cooperate with the U.N. regarding cessation of uranium enrichment.

Military confrontation may be on the horizon.
http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=3961
In addition to the British naval vessels at the Diego Garcia atoll in the Indian ocean, there is a multi-national force in the Persian Gulf. The British HMS Cornwall aircraft carrier strike group, the American aircraft carrier strike group Bremerton-based aircraft carrier CVN-74 John C. Stennis, the American aircraft carrier strike group USS Dwight D. Eisenhower and the French nuclear carrier Charles de Gaulle and its task force are all in close appoximation in the Persian Gulf.

More details about military options can be found here:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iran-strikes.htm

Iran has elicited "confessions" from the 15 British sailors they captured and may put them on trial for espionage. The penalty for espionage in Iran is death.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article1563877.ece
“If it is proven that they deliberately entered Iranian territory, they will be charged with espionage. If that is proven, they can expect a very serious penalty since according to Iranian law, espionage is one of the most serious offences.” Espionage carries a death sentence.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6493391.stm
Iran's detention of 15 Royal Navy personnel is "unjustified and wrong", Prime Minister Tony Blair has said. UK officials are waiting to be granted access to the HMS Cornwall staff, who were seized on Friday, and have not been told where the group are held.

"It simply is not true that they went into Iranian territorial waters and I hope the Iranian government understands how fundamental an issue this is for us," Mr Blair said.

"We have certainly sent the message back to them very clearly indeed. They should not be under any doubt at all about how seriously we regard this act, which is unjustified and wrong."

On March 23, 2007, U.S. and British officials said a boarding party from the frigate HMS Cornwall was seized about during a routine inspection of a merchant ship inside Iraqi territorial waters near the disputed Shatt al-Arab waterway.

The seizure of two Royal Navy inflatable boats took place just outside the mouth of the Shatt al-Arab waterway, a 125-mile channel dividing Iraq from Iran. Its name means Arab Coastline in Arabic, and Iranians call it Arvandrud - Persian for Arvand River. A 1975 treaty recognized the middle of the waterway as the border.

Iranians send arms to Iraqi extremists, including sophisticated roadside bombs. This week, two commanders of an Iraqi Shiite militia told The Associated Press in Baghdad that hundreds of Iraqi Shiites had crossed into Iran for training by the elite Quds force, a branch of Iran's Revolutionary Guard thought to have trained Hezbollah guerrillas in Lebanon.

Regarding enrichment of uranium, Iranian President Mahmaoud Ahmadinejad abruptly cancelled his appearance before the U.N. security council and in his stead, Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki Iran spoke. He indicated that Iran was willing to continue negotiations but without the precondition that uranium enrichment must be halted.

Mottaki said, "the world has two options to proceed on the nuclear issue: continued negotiations or confrontation. Choosing the path of confrontation ... will have its own consequences. "
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070325/D8O3E7J00.html

The U.N. security council unanimously voted to expand sanctions on March 24, 2007.

The new resolution 1747 calls on Iran to comply fully with all previous UN resolutions and join negotiations to reach agreement so as to restore international confidence in the peaceful nature of its nuclear program. Full transparency and cooperation with the IAEA are required. Suspension of Iran’s banned nuclear activities will elicit the parallel suspension of sanctions. The package of incentives offered Tehran last year for its cooperation remains on the table.

The full text of the draft of resolution 1747 appears at this website:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6455853.stm
.
.

Answer 9

yes it has started already.

Answer 10

BOOM...................but not by war