2007-03-24 19:30:17 · 25 answers · asked by Alex 2000 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Only if she wanted to.
2007-03-24 19:33:04 · answer #1 · answered by tonks_op 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Perhaps.
But remember that there is a chain reaction pretty much for every event in out history. Who knows..... if it weren't for Hitler, you may not even exist today. I know that I probably wouldn't. My dad, disgusted after growing up during World War 2, left Germany shortly thereafter; so - if it weren't for Hitler there may not have been WW2 and my dad may not have left Germany and thus may not have met my mother, etc....... Yes - Hitler was an atrocity but if you were able to change history, then who knows what the world would be like today......
Happykid: Be a little more open minded.......
Yes it may have saved a lot of lives, but on the other hand a lot of lives may not even exist.
2007-03-25 02:38:09 · answer #2 · answered by Sven B 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. Hitler may have been the leader but without followers you cannot accomplish anything. I would guess that if Hitler hadn't been the one who started the whole thing, someone else might have come along and done it. One of his high ranked followers perhaps. Also, the world would be different today if Hitler hadn't existed.
2007-03-25 02:35:36 · answer #3 · answered by Klavi 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, that would not have changed history. You see, Hitler has his strong group of supporters. So, if not him, somebody else would have taken his place to do the damage.
2007-03-25 02:39:31 · answer #4 · answered by saudipta c 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, this is like Hungarian play called "The tragedy of Man" It goes like this:
Adam once forsaw in a dream all of history, all the wars and famines and saw how terrible it will be. and how much people will suffer and how much hate there will be. When he woke up he wanted to kill himself. But God stopped him and ordered him, and all humanity, that his job is to keep up hope.
2007-03-25 03:11:13 · answer #5 · answered by the good guy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes.. as well as hugo chavez's mom.. jajaja but oh well.. that wouldn't have solved anything, chavez is here because of the people, so if he didn't existed probably the people would have "created" a similar one to satisfy their "needs".. that's why venezuela is crap... maybe it would have been the same in germany.. but who knows, my answer is still "yes".
2007-03-25 03:05:25 · answer #6 · answered by Atenea217 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hell yes. Same with Stalin's mom, Pol Pot's mom, Mao's mom, Franco's mom, Genghis Khan's mom, et al. When people cause that much human misery, one can say with much conviction that the world would have been better if they had never been born.
2007-03-25 02:36:43 · answer #7 · answered by crypto_the_unknown 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
If the mother had absolute knowledge of what her embryo would become (no free will, determinism) and she did not want to have a child then I would say it's her choice.
But if she still wanted to have it she could have given it some values later on.
2007-03-25 02:33:34 · answer #8 · answered by Dalarus 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, abortion is never the answer unless it's incest, rape, or the mother and/or baby will die during labor. I think that someone should have killed him, but how was his mother supposed to know how bad he would turn out?
2007-03-25 02:38:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
She did try to abort him but it didn't work. I personally think everyone is put on this earth for a reason. Even the ones like him.
2007-03-25 02:33:03 · answer #10 · answered by Just me 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
If I remember my history correctly, Hitler's mother was Catholic. She would have never had an abortion.
Why ask such a question? Hitler did what he did, and you can't change that.
2007-03-25 02:40:36 · answer #11 · answered by timmn 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋