English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Savage, Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter... When will neo-cons turn away from the re-education camps of the phony and ill informed?

2007-03-24 18:59:17 · 14 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government Politics

Its one thing to listen to entertaining dialogue. Neo-cons take the entertainment and swear by it as though it were the bible itself.

2007-03-24 19:04:39 · update #1

Cj (below) Still waiting for you to list someone I take notice of...

2007-03-24 19:08:52 · update #2

PS Cj, Hillary is as phony to me as the day is long (my opinion). Try again.

2007-03-24 19:10:19 · update #3

Jesse Jackson hasn't seen a TV camera he doesn't want pointed at him.

2007-03-24 19:11:45 · update #4

usarmor (below) They "stand by their convictions"??? This disturbs me the most about neo-cons (not calling you one). Bush admin members also "stand by their convictions". Their convictions are getting others killed. I could care less about another's "convictions" as I was taught to develop my own.

Jim Jones stood by his convictions along with Hitler and Stalin. This should be just one of a litany of things to look for in the heart of a person.

Thanks for the input.

2007-03-24 19:25:29 · update #5

Randi Rhodes is an extremist who closes her eyes to what she doesn't want to see. This goes without saying.

the difference: Neo-cons swear by the words of the lying bigot known as Rush Limbaugh (my opinion). I rarely hear democrats quoting Rani Rhodes as though her words were law.

2007-03-25 05:22:27 · update #6

14 answers

Can I find out somewhere the definition of a "neo-con" so I can figure out if I fit all these questions parameters?

"beacons of dark"? You ought to write books! Very poetic.

I HAPPENED to listen to Savage today, he was on the radio. But I haven't heard word one out of the others in a few years.

And yet, somehow, I manage to stay abreast of current events AND come to similar conclusions, all on my own.

Savage, btw, was discussing some goof ball lady who's husband was having an affair, nothing to do with current events when I was listening.

USARMOUR: Good point, what do you think of Randi Rhodes Chi? She certainly makes Rush look good. She's an absolute NUT (though I think she's all about the money, not truth. She doesn't even PRETEND to be honest!).

2007-03-24 19:14:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

About the time you turn from Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Ted Kennedy, Barbra Streisand, Jane Fonda, Angelina Joli, Martin Sheen, Jesse Jackson, Jimmy Carter, and the rest of the mental morons!

2007-03-24 19:06:54 · answer #2 · answered by C J 6 · 3 1

Chi guy, You refer to those people at "beacons of dark" but these are people who stand by their convictions and, albeit over the top sometimes, are very honest in their assessments and usually right. The fact is that you don't want to hear it because it intrudes on your "gray area" that liberals dwell in. There are some issues that are black and white.

Since you're talking about "beacons of dark" maybe you could tell us how you feel about Randi Rhodes or Al Franken.

If ever there were beacons of dark, they are truly it.

2007-03-24 19:17:02 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 3 1

beacons of dark, eah. Just another example of the left calling people dark because they differ in opinion. And to think the left and the democrats are supposed to be the party of tolerance. conservatives think for themselves, thats why most of them are successful and are educated. people on the left are poor, self loathing kool-aid drinkers that listen to people like Jesse Jackson and Hillary clinton who tell them they dont have a chance. snap out of it and quit being so angry because if you listen to those people you will not have a chance. And beacons of darkness? Please. Liberal judges let child molesters go on probation, liberals support abortioon (so much for the party of tolerance).

2007-03-24 19:14:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

None of those people are neo-cons. They are all conservatives.

Neo-cons are former democrats. They still haven't been purged of all their liberalness, That is the only thing wrong with neo-cons

2007-03-24 19:06:23 · answer #5 · answered by archangel72901 4 · 3 1

They are all part of the Bush spin machine

2007-03-24 19:17:29 · answer #6 · answered by marcusm15 2 · 0 0

I think they seek out the Republican Party's talking points to tell them what to think.

2007-03-24 19:26:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Who decides people are a beacon of darkness - the left?

2007-03-24 19:05:58 · answer #8 · answered by Terrie 3 · 3 1

Where did you get put in as judge of education and right and wrong?

I was told that was my Job and you are full of BS

2007-03-24 19:05:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Well, some may not understand, but most do not have yr heart ...how does it feel to have somthing that most cant even im...?

2007-03-24 19:06:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers