When a guy gets a girl pregnant without her consent, he's a sex offender and a felon. But when God knocks up Mary without her consent, it's all ok.
Hey, I think most any woman would be ok with carrying a child if she later learned it was the direct offspring of God. But that's consent after-the-fact. Where is it written that Mary was cool with being knocked up from the moment of conception?
Sounds like God slipped Mary the ultimate mickey.
Is there a double standard here?
2007-03-24
18:46:52
·
13 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Hey guys, thanks to all who cited Luke 1:38 as evidence that she consented. But like I said, this consent comes after-the-fact. According to Luke 1:31, the angel Gabriel TELLS her she's going to have the child, and TELLS her what she has to name him. He doesn't ask, "Hey Mary, would it be ok with you the Big Guy knocks you up?" No, he TELLS her.
Hey, this Gabriel guy sounds like bad news. I mean, what if an intimidating guy you've never met before comes to you and says, "You WILL kiss my appendage." What if you're a meek little damsel as Mary is shown to be? Are you going to debate him? He's intimidating, for Pete's sake! And, this is all before the women's lib movement.
So, the question remains, when did the Big Guy get consent BEFORE Mary was TOLD what she had to do?
2007-03-24
19:44:55 ·
update #1