2007-03-24 17:36:33 · 13 answers · asked by -(O_o)-Roboto 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Of course. But not due to *technology*. Rather, due to science, general knowledge, increased education levels, logic, truth, rationalism, realization of the differences between nature and the (non-existent) supernatural, etc. (We're *only* ~150 y.o.!)
2007-03-24 17:38:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The Revelation of Jesus Christ is the only eventuality that you can count on.
Some questions in life can not be answered by science. These types of questions are usually moved into the realms of philosophy and spirituality. Science will never replace spirituality.
2007-03-24 17:52:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Advances in technology and understanding of our existence may very well discredit all religions but I do not think it will discredit a god. Have you read gods bible, its called physics.
God exists but its obvious that life did not start with adam and eve and its obvious that Earth is not the only planet with life in our universe. Why cant creationism and evolution find common ground. I think if there were no religions God would be much more credible.
2007-03-24 17:44:27 · answer #3 · answered by shawnrgregg 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We can only hope that as mankind becomes more technologically advanced and educated, he will come to know that religion and belief in god is irrelevant and rely on himself to be good and moral without the crutch of religion.
2007-03-24 17:40:12 · answer #4 · answered by Rogue Scrapbooker 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
On the contrary, Science will lead many people to the one true God. Many men of science like Einstein and Hoyle found God in the work they did.
God who is wisdom cannot contradict the wisdom and discoveries of science which comes from God.
Peace!
2007-03-24 17:50:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the strengthen in technologies isn't in basic terms over one hundred years, that's over 4 hundred or extra years in keeping with human beings like Newton, Galileo atc. no longer plenty on their discoveries and innovations, in spite of the indisputable fact that those have been substantial, yet in keeping with conduct of innovations that they pioneered. You wager incorrect. those "on the right" have marginally extra ideal technologies than those procuring their desktops from the community departmental save. that's because of fact they are in a position to have adequate money greater high quality kit and have some experts to maintain it for them. Do you think of a president or best minister wastes time attempting to handle computing gadget issues? Do you think of they get on a working laptop or computing gadget in any respect? They hire human beings to try this for them. there is not any sign of any civilisations extra progressed than we are having existed everywhere on earth. there is not any sign of the mines, the roads, the canals, the factories, the place of work homes, the laboratories, the railways or the canals. you may no longer build a complicated techological civilisation from straw, dirt and timber.
2016-10-20 09:52:21 · answer #6 · answered by grauer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I consider myself a scientific atheist. I struggle, however, with one question;"Would any being properly referred to as god fall within an empirical domain?" If the answer to this question is no, asking for evidence is not rational. Answering no does, however, make such a being empirically (and therefor practically) irrelevant.
2007-03-24 17:49:48 · answer #7 · answered by neil s 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so.
Spiritual yearning has nothing to do with technology.
They've been saying that religion will die off to science for hundreds of years now anyway.
2007-03-24 17:44:20 · answer #8 · answered by Lisa the Pooh 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I totally agree with you 100%
2007-03-24 17:39:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I see no relation between technology and atheism.
2007-03-24 18:02:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋