Why do people persist in using the word "Creation" or "Evolution" to explain the Universe?

Question

I am come to liberate this world!

Look at creation! or What created animals? What created this and What created that......Creation is just another term to try to explain nothing. Creation and God are two peas in the same "vocabulary" pod. Why? Because Life Forces? People generally believe in one of Two theories: either Creation or Evolution? Let me introduce you to another theory. 'The Third Theory'

The Third Theory is "Always Was, Always Will Be" aka "The Circle Theory". That is just as easy to believe don't you think? At least it gives room for thinking. When our sun is ready to nova, for example, where do you think mankind will be then? The problem with Intelligent Design is that it presumes to include Mankind.

So pardon moi. Evolution explains only the origin of the species you think? On earth. You are so myopic if you think that. Have you ever heard about the evolution of the galaxies, stars? Or extrapolate from earth to universe is not so far fetched. Do you suppose Creation only refers to the earth to explain the Universe

Answer 1

Evolution has NOTHING to do with the origins of existence, of all matter, of the universe, of the world, etc etc.

Answer 2

It's because Christians believe that the whole thing is a pop up book for retarded Gods that can't even remember their own name. Pop up 1, The universe. Pop up 2. the earth Pop up 3. all the wildlife pop up 4. etc, etc, etc,.

Compromise: Christian Un-named God creates cosmic plasma to explosion point then gets out of the way and lets evolution takes over.
The Norse Gods would probably build their place while the explosion was still going on....they're tough dudes.

Answer 3

Circle theory huh? That's a new one. This isn't even a question, you're just rant rant ranting and making up stuff. Are you that bored. Don't worry about how the world or universe was made. You're obviously having issues dealing with reality so try not to bite off more than you can chew, man.

Answer 4

I agree. i think of atheism and pantheism are 2 techniques of asserting greater-or-much less an identical ingredient. Edit: I now no longer use the word "God" because meaning "previous guy interior the sky" to too a lot of human beings. Or no longer less than, human beings take that to propose a private god, so it is much less complicated and greater descriptive to easily say "the Universe" or "Being" or "stress" or some thing human beings won't misread as plenty.

Answer 5

The theory of evolution does not purport to explain the creation of the universe or the creation of life.

Answer 6

I would say that evolution is set of facts about how life came to be, creation should explain why universe was created, nothing beyond that.

It should be easy enough to combine them both in one theory.

Anyways, I do not have problem in believing in both, i mean knowin that one is a fact, and other a mere phillosophy.

Answer 7

They don't. Christians use the word Creation to explain the universe. Evolution only explains how living things got to where they are today. It is NOT the same thing as abiogensis or universal creation.

Answer 8

Ask Artur Dent from a small planet called Earth, or his companion Ford Prefect. Read the Hitchhickers guide or read Memnoch.

Answer 9

Intelligent design is to science what cartoons are to the contents of a library.

Circle of life? Where have we heard that before? O ya the Lion King.
Simba! I am very disappointed with you.

Answer 10

Well duh, mankind exists, therefore an explanation of us must be included in any explanation of how the rest of creation was accomplished. All that your "liberating" does is add another possibility to the table, it doesn't negate the other two, and it gives less evidence to support it than EITHER of the others.