I think this would have made for a great evenly matched fight and would end in a draw. I don't see any differences or advantage, very similar. They both had and still have a great amount of heart.
2007-03-24 12:58:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by gman 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Wow, what a match up, talk about a war, I hesitate at the thought of this one going past six. Tunney's got to be the underdog in this one simply because of the lever of competition Holyfield face during his career. Tunny couldn't have seen the likes of Bowe, Lewis, Tyson, or even Forman. Evander would have eventually wore Tunny down, but most likely would have had to come off the canvass to do it.
Holyfield by KO in eight.
2007-03-24 21:48:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by blogbaba 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tunney
2007-03-24 17:55:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by The_good_guy 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
HOLYFIELD IS BIGGER, A STRONGER PUNCHER AND AS GOOD A BOXER. THIS NOT A HARD FIGHT FOR EVANDER. VANDER IN A 15 RD UNANIMOUS DECISION.
2007-03-24 22:27:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by smitty 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Holyfield, he is good he's got it he has to have it, but he can be beat
2007-03-24 18:08:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Friend 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
TUNNEY
2007-03-24 19:02:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by RICH T 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
no idea again , I dont watch boxing .:
2007-03-25 08:31:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Hope Summer 6
·
0⤊
1⤋