English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-24 08:30:29 · 31 answers · asked by The Daughter of the King, BaC 6 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

31 answers

No. It causes retardation in children and deformaties.

Edit: Why am I getting thumbs down? Are you people out there actually plowing your brothers and sisters? I'm telling the truth, for cripe's sake. Inbreeding causes mental retardation and physical deformaties in children because of the dna being too closely matched. Sheesh.

2007-03-24 08:33:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 6

Now that homosexuals are being allowed to marry and the law says that two consenting adults can do anything they want behind closed doors as long as it's not endangering others, it seems hypocritical from a legal standpoint to disallow incest or marriage of a brother and sister (or these days two brothers or two sisters), altough it's way off the charts as a social faux pas even now that homosexuality isn't .

2007-03-24 20:52:42 · answer #2 · answered by D.L. Miller 3 · 0 0

Sure, back in the historical times royal families around the globe married their siblings to keep the blood in the families, but cause all of health problems

2007-03-24 15:34:53 · answer #3 · answered by Tyler M 2 · 3 0

HI
No. That would be incest and since there are so many people in the world there is no need to marry relatives. Siblings who have married and have children have many health problems with their children because a hereditary disease doubly carries in their child even worse.
Lammy

2007-03-24 15:34:03 · answer #4 · answered by Clammy S 5 · 1 2

Hell know thats how learning disabilities are formed. There is an island in the bahamas where the whole community is only 2 families, and there are so many mentally disabled people out there because of incest.

2007-03-24 15:35:05 · answer #5 · answered by Larry K 1 · 0 1

No. The entire reason close relatives are not supposed to have sex is because we're imperfect, and the genetic repercussions for the children could leave them impaired mentally and physically. Take your worst problems physically and mentally and then double them. Does that sound like fun?

2007-03-24 15:33:50 · answer #6 · answered by Epitome_inc 4 · 1 1

No, scientist have show, there is a greater chance of birth defect in children of this relationship due the gene spread. If on the other hand, both parties agree to sterilization, then I see no problems with it.

2007-03-24 15:38:32 · answer #7 · answered by MoPleasure4U 4 · 0 1

I care about who I marry, not anyone else.
I read this book called the bible, and in the first chapter it seems the character called God encouraged siblings to procreate, because everyone on earth came from two people.

2007-03-24 15:35:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Why not? siblings have been marrying and having babies since recorded history, and yet the human race goes on and the planet has not plunged into the sun...

2007-03-24 15:34:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

2 REASONS WHY YOU SHOULDN'T - If your religious or spiritual, then you would know that God does not approve. Second, If you want to have healthy children without any deformities, then don't marry your sibling.

2007-03-24 15:39:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

i heard that it was illegal for siblings to marry. when siblings have children they have very high risks to develop long term diseases.

2007-03-24 15:33:45 · answer #11 · answered by Susie Q 2 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers