2007-03-24 07:35:52 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health ➔ General Health Care ➔ Pain & Pain Management
I say yes. It's really hard to adjust in the spring. I used to have to be at work at 6:00 a.m. Just as it would begin to get light out as I was going to work, the daylight savings time would kick in to make sure that I'd go to work in the dark and then get off work in the dark. No thanks.
It saves energy like not flushing a toilet every time really saves a lot of water. The big users of energy are major industries who will need to use energy to crank out production regardless of the hour.
And, if you are home and live in a warm climate, you'll have to run your air conditioning one hour earlier because you're home an hour earlier. Assuming you don't run your A/C 24/7. So, what it really saves are bureaucrat's jobs. They have to have something to do to justify holding on to their positions.
If the generating power plant is nuke, does it really save anything? If it's coal, it saves coal and does a miner out of a job. So, go figure.
2007-03-24 08:06:58 · answer #1 · answered by rann_georgia 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why? It's a tool to save energy. It keeps the clocks set so that most of the daylight hours are time when we are awake.
2007-03-24 07:55:41 · answer #2 · answered by D28Guy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes stay on GMT for ever, it worked for a few hundred years and the rest of the world I think use GMT so why keep changing.
2007-03-24 09:00:10 · answer #3 · answered by phil b 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Think about it please, this question is asked ten times very year.
the answer is that it allows children to get to school and back in the light
2007-03-27 07:47:06 · answer #4 · answered by jimgdad 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, we should stop using standard time.
2007-03-24 09:57:35 · answer #5 · answered by Classy Granny 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes
2007-03-24 07:38:02 · answer #6 · answered by laplandfan 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋