Bush 100% balls no matter what you think.
Clinton has to hide and makeup for all his mistakes .
Kerry haha cant even speak.
2007-03-24 06:44:50 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I don't think we even need a president, all we need is our two branches.
2007-03-24 06:48:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Bush 100% retarded and has made more mistakes than 40 Presidents put together (and as for hiding so did he from military service)
Clinton..why hide..I never saw him hide, he was always out in open.
Kerry who cannot make up mind
I would pick Clinton as he is only one who can tie shoes, his military incursion into Serbia was not a 4 year fiasco, and proved he could run a country and make it better while he was in charge. The other 2 are useless to all life on Earth let alone America.
2007-03-24 13:57:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If you think Clinton was golden and only lied about sex. How about the fact he let Osama go three times. Sold missle technology to the Chinese. Still maintained Iraq imbargo with no penalty for the Iraqi government (Remember Food -for-oil?). Pulled out our troops from Somalia emboldening the Islamic Fanatics and causing the deaths of thousands of Somalies after only a couple of soldiers deaths. He then drew down the military and scraped up-dating military equipment.
As a soldier I can't even talk about Kerry with out getting sick!
Most of the trash Bush has delt with was left overs. The only place Bush made a misstake might be not enough troops on the ground too start with in Iraq.
Remember no one liked Lincoln either!
I'll take Bush any day!
And this is from a soldier in Iraq!
2007-03-24 14:23:58 · answer #3 · answered by Sarge 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Actually I think Kerry or Clinton are both better speakers than Bush, with his little cowboy phrases and squeeky chuckles. Just because Bush got us into a war, does not mean he has any gajones. He's not the one that has to go there, after all.
I really don't care for Clinton or Kerry, either, anyway. To me, Bush was just the lesser of the two evils. Now I'm not so sure anymore.
2007-03-24 13:48:43 · answer #4 · answered by merlin_steele 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush
2007-03-24 14:55:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton! Bush seems too childish to me. Kerry, well it's a given. I always respect all the presidents who are in office, but even thoughh I'm a democrat, I want Gulianni, (who is running next term).
2007-03-24 13:48:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Fred Thompson
2007-03-24 13:48:37 · answer #7 · answered by jack y 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush's balls don't mean very much to the mother who had to bury her son because he died in Iraq over a lie.
If the only way you know of to resolve a conflict is through fighting, you are a very stupid person. It takes absolutely nothing to send someone else's family off to war-I wonder how he'd act if it was HE in combat? Texas Air National Guard...yeah, right. What balls?
2007-03-24 13:51:15 · answer #8 · answered by melouofs 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Tom Tancredo hands down! The rest should grow some big, ugly hairy ones!
2007-03-24 13:49:27 · answer #9 · answered by ShadowCat 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree, bush has his faults i'll be the first to admit it, but i'll also be the first one to say that he is the only politician around that does what he believes in and follows through. Alot of people say 30 years from now people will admire him for his foresight
2007-03-24 13:48:42 · answer #10 · answered by Nate 1 · 3⤊ 2⤋
McCain All the way!
Why? You ask?, Because, ...He was a P.O.W. in Vietnam, so he won't put our troops in harms way unless it is absolutey necessary, since he understands combat suffering...Also, he is a moderate and will maintain a moderate outlook...all others ohhh noooo, especially Guilliani...please?!
2007-03-24 13:54:45 · answer #11 · answered by TAHOE REALTOR 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋