English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

HAHAHAHAHA - that is a brilliant question.

My answer is: Enough to turn the Sahara into a rainforest.

2007-03-24 07:16:28 · answer #1 · answered by Blitzhund 4 · 1 0

i think the section that confounds maximum persons is the undeniable fact that, with a distinctive mind-blowing exception who might have had unterior motives, each and every physique gave the impression to be working jointly in unity, united in opposition to another enemy, and then, unexpectedly, the persons you so aptly defined, went thoroughly partisan often problem and placed their own political objectives merely before the safety & safety of the rustic. To make concerns, worse, between the Republicans began behaving like they have been Democrats and were spening funds like a bunch of drunken liberals (sorry Uncle Teddy), and that was compounded interior the direction of the President's refusal to undertaking the veto pen as ordinarily as he will ought to have. we've got a impediment the region the frontrunning candidate on the left is a nicely nicely-known and reputed criminal who, alongside together with her husband, in no way observed a campaign contribution that they does not acquire and who, alongside together with her husband, might sell their very souls (if in reality they got here prepared with souls) for a pair of money in bribes from the chinese language government. This harpie, and her fellow applicants, forgot their early professional-america stance and characteristic suffered a convenience of memory because of the fact it pertains to their until now speeches and vote. on the different part, we've got the erstwhile former mayor of contemporary York, who's greater often than not the only candidate on the two factor of the aisle with even a modicum of government journey. He ain't suitable, inspite of the undeniable fact that he remains the mind-blowing decision obtainable contained accessible.

2016-12-08 10:13:23 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

American people do not care about their carbon footprint. Why else do they run those huge cars?

Maybe they should legalise drugs and it would bring more people back into the 60's hippy movement. Yeah flower power and loving the earth and each other would be preferable to the current mindset don't you think?

2007-03-24 06:19:47 · answer #3 · answered by Carrie S 7 · 0 0

most Americans NOW FINALLY are STARTING to care about the environment. but they do little/nothing to reduce anything...well there was that one thing that bush....
the only way if America was to do something like that (which they'd b crazy to do lol - better to "plant "alga or something) is the Democrats win - which looks GOOD!
thanks feck!

2007-03-24 09:31:55 · answer #4 · answered by Soylent 4 · 0 0

i think the soil need hundrands years to recover before planting any trees.

2007-03-24 06:32:25 · answer #5 · answered by yiufdbgkhfjj 3 · 0 0

Congratulations, you win the Silly Question of the Day award....

2007-03-24 07:11:31 · answer #6 · answered by Team Chief 5 · 0 1

I don't think they have enof room unless they try and take over another country may be that would do it

2007-03-24 06:11:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

speaking of americans i quite like bannas and custard

2007-03-24 06:11:42 · answer #8 · answered by MagikBrook 1 · 0 0

How many will you plant for this stupid bunch of liberal lies?

2007-03-24 06:39:41 · answer #9 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 0 1

they'll have to move the entire amazon

2007-03-24 06:10:39 · answer #10 · answered by *YAWN* 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers