Could Global Warming caused by CO gases be a load of rubbish?

Question

I know its off topic but an interesting follow up to an earlier question?



http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html

Answer 1

Global warming nuts don't want facts,the most important thing to them is the political ramifications of global warming issues. I notice they never menion that only around 20% of the scientists who make their living in some aspect that surrounds climate issues actually agrees with the global warming hysteria. And I would bet that alot of the global warming believers support the theory because it keeps the grant money coming in. Also found it interesting that some well known scientists who were speaking against current global warming myths later started getting harrassed, including some who stopped speaking out because they were getting death threats,so much for an open and honest debate. There is ample proof that the current global temperature trends are nothing more than a part of a natural cycle,whether that cycle is caused by solar radiation or factors here on Earth or both is debatable but the important part is that it's natural. Are these perhaps the same scientists that were warning of global cooling in the mid 70's? Anything for the almighty grant dollar.

AD

Answer 2

Science does not argue against global warming. Most accept it as fact and is an ongoing part of the cyclic process of the earths environment. What has made it such a big deal is that environmentalists are acting as if this is something new and are exploiting it for political purposes.
The real facts are that CO2 gases are formed by global warming and not vice versa.
Human contribution to the natural occurance of global warming amounts to only .00001% of the total factors that must be attributed. The major influence comes from the 12 year cycle of solar flares. 2nd would be the hole in the ozone layer positioned over the poles. Actually climatologists have determined that Bovine Flatulence contributes 100 times more than the alleged CO2 emmissions from fossil fuels.
If you read in Genesis you will discover that the earth was once encased in a global canopy.
Genesis1;6-7 Then God said let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
Thus God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament; and it was so.
The firmament being spoken of here is the physical properties of the elements that make up our atmosphere and the layer of ozonal compounds at the higher limits of those elements. In order for the flood to completely cover the planet God had to collapse the upper canopy. In Genesis 7 verse 11, read....on that day all the fountains of the deep were broken up and the windows of heaven were opened. The opening of the windows of heaven is the creation of the holes in the ozone layer which permitted the upper canopy of water to fall to the earth. The result of the exposure to UV rays from the sun has been manifested in the genetic alteration of man in the differences in skin pigmentation, the lowered lifespans and the introduction of meat as sustenance to offset the change in plant life which altered its ability to give us the full nutritional benefit it had before our exopsure to Ultraviolet light which the vapor canopy protected us from.

The real motive for the Global warming scare is political. Those who would have us give up our sovereignity as a nation and enter into the world community with a global governing authority are using the scare of what we are doin to the earth as a tool to accept their Global agenda of world domination. Do you not think it odd that Mikhail Gorbachev is the head of the "Green Party?" Partnered with Prince Philip and our own Al Gore? How convenient.

At the current rate of global warming it is estimated that by the year 2050 the average global temperature is expected to rise .04 % of 0ne degree.

What suckers we be...eh?

Answer 3

It sure could be. Let's not forget that Global Warming is still just a theory. Somewhere along the line that has been forgotten.

Answer 4

If this were true then the most to blame would be those people who are burning up the rain forests so they can plsnt Yams for a few years. It of course is a hoax.

Answer 5

Its all rubbish. Mars is also getting warmer; is there also an increase of CO gases on Mars?

Answer 6

yeah, and i think that it is.

think about it. we've supposedly had like 3 ice ages. now unless the freezing point of water also decreases, (causing the water to melt without getting warmer) we've obviousy had global warming before. and unless the dinosaurs were as bad of polluters as we are made out to be, then i think that we're fine with the world "getting hotter".

Answer 7

The idea that its necessarily caused by one thing alone greatly amuses me. However - the second most popular and viable theory involves fluctuations in stellar raidation. So yes....CO2 is not definately to blame.

Answer 8

Yes, Carbon Dioxide and Sulphor Dioxide is released into the atmosphere by power stations and heats up the planet.

Answer 9

No, it's (almost) universally accepted. It's fact.

Answer 10

maybe garbage