Christians: What if the Nicene Council threw out the wrong NT books?

Answer 1

They did.

Answer 2

From the content ( in terms of hanging tother logically) it seems pretty clear that they did. ( For example the Apocalype of Peter, deals with the problem of a loving god having a hell - its not permanent). The nicene council had little to do with working out the problems of the religion and more to do with coming up with something acceptable to church and roman leaders.

As to the number of manuscripts. All that shows is that transcription was proper, a thousand copies of a source are still only one source. The Davinci code ( horrible poorly written book) is one arugument against the bible, not one for every copy published.

Answer 3

Wow B, time to go back to the library. The Council of Nicea's purpose was to deal with a particular heresy, the scripture wasn't canonized until some hundred years later at the Chaldean council.
Try again, Blinky.

Answer 4

there have been 1000's of Christian texts written, as somebody stated in the question approximately Barnabus. yet not all those texts are the Gospels yet some are further texts that is considerable too. good judgment and e book of Mormon says the books of the Gospels must be from the hand of the 12 apostles, which shows there must be 12 books. John is allegedly to blame for the two the e book of John and Revelation, nevertheless clues on the top of John bypass-referenced with different verses in John and the different Gospel books with reference to the final supper advise John did not write the e book of John, yet his call on it particularly is a corruption. which potential 5 of the apostle books are coated and seven are lacking. besides to those, there are additionally further texts (including one or 2 from Ms. Magdalene) that is considerable to pay interest on. Peter and James each and each have books in the NT, yet they don't checklist the ministry of Jesus as Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John do yet do grant Christians teachings. i don't know if those qualify as area of the Gospels or not. For different apostles authors, that leaves Thomas, Bartholomew (who i assume is Barnabus), Andrew, Philip, the different James, and Simon (not Simon who replaced into noted as Peter). Why does that record six while there ought to in basic terms be 5 greater? a sort of is the author of Luke, the author's call replaced into corrupted. Like Paul, Luke replaced into not an apostle yet joined later (he replaced right into a chum of Paul's) and ought to not have written the account given in Luke. What approximately Judas, the betrayer? i discussed him in third paragraph above. start up with John 20:20-24 and bypass-reference with clues from bills of the final supper in John and the different books. BofMormon says "that great and abominable church ... they have taken away ... many areas that are basic and maximum priceless; and additionally many covenants of the Lord have they taken away." a million Nephi 13:26

Answer 5

God is quite capable of making sure that His word would be what He wanted it to be. In addition, there are other checks that have come down through historical discoveries that validate what we have. If you are not interested in knowing what has been found, then you would be ignorant of such things, and would ask questions such as what you have done here. There is a lot more that supports the Bible that is not necessarily "Christian" than what you are obviously aware of.
On the same line as your question though, how do the Moslem's know that the third Caliph didn't burn the right Koran when he chose 1 version out of the 20 that were in circulation in his day? Faith, based on what? Christians have a lot more supportive documents than they do, that is why we can be sure. Please remember that the Bible's Old Testament is based on the Jewish Torah, and Talmud.
God allows what He allows because of 2 reasons, free will of man, and because man has rejected Him. Man did so at Eden, only those who want to do things His way does He offer His ways to. Don't like crime, to bad, man brought all of this on himself.

Answer 6

According to the late Dr. Bruce M Metzger, one of the
translators for RSV and NRSV Bibles, the New Testament is
trustworthy. For instance, the first century Josephus is
considered a trustworthy source for Jewish history. His
widely accepted work The Jewish War has about nine
manuscripts written in the tenth, eleventh, and twelfth
centuries. There’s one Latin manuscript in the fourth
century. On another example, Homer’s popular work Iliad
has about 650 Greek manuscripts.

The New Testament in contrast, has over 5,000 Greek
manuscripts catalogued. Quite a few predate the Nicene
Council. There are about 8,000 to 10,000 Latin
manuscripts, 8,000 in Ethiopic, Slavic, and Armenian.
All of which combined are about 99.5% pure – more so
than any work in antiquity. His statement about the NT,
“We can have great confidence in the fidelity with which
this material has come down to us, especially compared
with any other ancient literary work.” Dr. Metzger
taught at Princeton University for 46 years and died
February 13, 2007 of natural causes.

Answer 7

The belief in Christianity, and specifically Fundamentalist Christianity, are rooted in the belief that the Bible is divinely inspired. So there really isn't a possibility that "the wrong books" were selected or omitted.

Is there something in particular that you think should have been left in?

Answer 8

No, the NT is very reliable. The left out books did not meet the reliability test and time line. : )

Answer 9

Personally I would have liked to have seen the Book of Enoch included in the modern bible. I'm not a christian though.

Answer 10

Some christians will tell you that god wouldn't allow that... but doesn't that mean he'd be depriving the council members of their free will? You know, that's the reason he doesn't stop bad people who rape and kill kids, or so they tell me.

Answer 11

The Word states that the worlds are maintained by the Word so I am sure the God that gave us His Word can maintain it. Because he said heavens and earth shall pass away but my word shall not pass away. I want to be in his word, then i know God will maintain me.